Westbrook Soccer League
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 010436354
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2013–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
- Location
- Westbrook, ME, USA
- Phone
- 2077668554
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Human Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $70,459
- Expenses
- $57,490
- Assets
- $32,010
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ALLISON DROUIN (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ALLISON SMYTH (TREASURER)
- ALLISON DROUIN (PRESIDENT)
- DANIELLE SNEIDER (VP RECREATIO)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The westbrook soccer league is a non-profit corporation committed to providing the youth of westbrook, Maine with oppotunities to learn and to play the game of soccer. The organization will emphasize commitment, cooperation, fun, leadership, sportsmanship, teamwork, along with an understanding and appreciation of the game.
What it reported doing in 2025
Cultivated an understanding of, and an appreciation of, the game of soccer. Educated and instructed the youth of westbrook, me on the importance of cooperation, sportsmanship, and physcial exercise. Facilitated the development of its players' physical, social and emotional characteristics. Fostered an attitude and atmosphere of fun for its players, coaches, and parents. Provided its players with a variety of soccer-playing opportunities to enhance skill development and the development of sound technical habits. Provided its coaches with ongoing educational and training opportunities to improve instruction and teaching. Sought feedback from its members and continued to work toward improvement.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 89% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 50
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 74.4%; rating input score 74
- Program expense ratio: 91.2%; rating input score 91
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 18.4%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.56; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -0.2% per year; rating input score 0; 47th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -0% per year; rating input score 0; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.9% per year; rating input score 100; 53rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 74.4% of revenue deployed · 91.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $52K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 11 filing years from 2013 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 34/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.