Westborough Rangers Youth Football and Cheering Organization Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 222642691
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2012–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2020, Form 990-N 2010
- Location
- Westborough, MA, USA
- Phone
- 5088717061
- Rating
- 81
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $20,972
- Expenses
- $28,977
- Assets
- $6,305
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- JOE MONTIVERDI (PRESIDENT)
- PETER MARINO (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- JOE MONTIVERDI (PRESIDENT)
- SCOTT MELESKI (TREASURER)
- PETER MARINO (VICE PRESIDENT)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The organization is organized to develop and operate a football and cheerleading program in affiliation with american youth football (ayf) in conformity with and pursuant to the principles, rules, and regulations enunciated by said ayf. The objective of this organization is to seek to implant in the youth of the communities involved (regardless of race, gender, creed, religion or national origin) the ideals of good sportsmanship, honesty, loyalty, courage, scholarship, and reverance so that they may be finer, stronger, and happier youth who will grow to be good, healthy adults.
What it reported doing in 2020
The organization provided an organized, supervised football and cheerleading program for 63 youth football players and 14 cheerleaders from the community.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 68% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 94
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 29
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 85.4%; rating input score 85
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -38.2%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 73; 73rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -8.2% per year; rating input score 0; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -6.2% per year; rating input score 0; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -18.1% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 85.4% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $25K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2012 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.