West Virginia State University Research & Development Corporation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 550708567
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2015–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Institute, WV, USA
- Phone
- 3047664133
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $21,949,840
- Expenses
- $21,431,082
- Assets
- $8,278,714
- Liabilities
- $4,292,663
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KIMBERLY DUFF (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- DR AMI SMITH (VICE CHAIR): $203,995 total reported compensation
- KIMBERLY DUFF (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $136,505 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To foster, support, and assist in any research and economic development activities consistent with the educational objectives and mission of West Virginia state university.
What it reported doing in 2024
Cooperative state research education & extension service - the mission of the division of agricultural, consumer, environmental, and outreach programs (aceop) is to "aid in the academic, technological, economic, and social advancement of the state of West Virginia by identyfing resources and programs pertinent to the progression and dissemination of knowledge and services by way of research, teaching, and extension". Listed below are the program areas which fall under the cooperative state research and extension service: agriculture and natural resources - provides research-based educational programs and technical assistance to farmers, commodity groups, agribusiness, and provides horticultural and pest management assistance to the broader citizenship of West Virginia. Alternative agriculture - alternative agriculture products and practices such as organic farming and hydroponic systems are an important component in north american agriculture. Aquaculture - the farming of aquatic organisms such as fish has developed into the fastest-growing segment of agriculture in the united states. Breeding greenhouse tomatoes - greenhouse tomato production represents 17 percent of the total production in the us and a 30-40 percent increase is expected in the future. Community and agricultural resource development - work to strengthen the economic and social vitality of communities. One of its newest efforts is the digiso digital media center at the economic development center in the west side of charleston, wv. Resilient youth and families - aceop serves West Virginia's communities of families through the provision of client-centered educational programs. The youth education programs, based on the 4-h model, involve group activities, club meetings camps, fairs, and contests for its members. 4-h is a national initiative that provides opportunities for youth to meet new people, gain leadership skills, set and achieve skills, learn life skills, and build self-confidence. Soil remediation - each year in West Virginia, thousands of acres of forests are disturbed through the processes of logging, development, and extractive industries such as coal and natural gas. Vegetable genomics - the future of u.s. Vegetable production depends on the continued genetic improvement and development of new superior cultivars.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 98% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 75% for direct work, and 25% for grants.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Few specific pay-setting methods are documented in the filing; unanswered boxes are not proof of absence and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 86
- Transparency & Controls: 71
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 37
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 96.5%; rating input score 96
- Program expense ratio: 98.8%; rating input score 99
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 100%; rating input score 100; 72nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 86.7%; rating input score 87; 19th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 6 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 2.4%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.39; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.52; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 1.6%; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 7% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 59th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 96.5% of revenue deployed · 98.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 15 board members independent · 6 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $21.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $204K · 15 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 10 filing years from 2015 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 3 of 9 not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 27/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Federal audit findings: this organization reported findings in its latest federal Single Audit.