West Virginia Recovers Org Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
932408861
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2024–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Huntington, WV, USA
Rating
58
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alliance/Advocacy Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$125,000
Expenses
$127,843
Assets
$3,674

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • John McAtee (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Richard Washington (Presiden)
  • Jessica Smith (Secretary)
  • Rick Wisman (Treasurer)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Charity

What it reported doing in 2025

Travel and outreach: covered costs for staff providing two in-person group trainings on whole health and wellbeing one in Wheeling WV 19 participants and a second in Romney WV.15 participants Additionally funded a Recovery Coach training for 24 participants in Morgantown and an in-person Training of Facilitators 11participants for the whole health and wellbeing training in Romney WV. This also included outreach to events to educate and inform participants and the public of programming available. Other included field visits to affiliates in the West Virginia Recovers peer program network in Wheeling Ripley Huntington Charleston Romney and Berkeley County Martinsburg WV. This also included staff trainings and in person board meeting team building event.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 39
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 14
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 38.8%; rating input score 39
  • Program expense ratio: 37.9%; rating input score 38

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -2.3%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.03; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 54.8%; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 194.9% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 123.5% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 39.2% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 38.8% of revenue deployed · 37.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $48K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 39/100.
  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 38/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 24/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 4/100.