West Virginia on the Move Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
201538740
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2011–2013
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2013
Location
St Albans, WV, USA
Phone
3043892500
Rating
73
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Physical Fitness and Community Recreational Facilities

Reported finances

Revenue
$32,430
Expenses
$37,922
Assets
$30,071
Liabilities
$24,418

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

11 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ADAM FLACK (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR PART YE)

People named in this filing

  • RON ECK (MEMBER)
  • WILLIAM NEAL (MEMBER)
  • DELORIS WILDER (CHAIR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2013. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To promote a physically active lifestyle for all west virginians by offering leadership, technical expertise and collaboration in order to reduce the prevalence of chronic disease.

What it reported doing in 2013

Seniors on the move - collaborated with senior centers statewide to promote walking programs.southern wv on the move - to date enrolled over 2,800 wv citizens in a walking program in 5 southern wv counties and promoted walking as an easy form of physical activity that most people can do.schools on the move - to date supported 52 schools in 26 wv counties in promoting physical activity opportunities before, during or after school through a competitive grant program.communities on the move - collaborated with several partners to implement health promotion or physical activity interventions in wv and supported development of wv physical activity plan.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 91% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 25
  • Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 66.6%; rating input score 67
  • Program expense ratio: 56.9%; rating input score 57

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -16.9%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.79; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.81; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 25.2%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -37.4% per year; rating input score 0; 15th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -37.5% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -57% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 66.6% of revenue deployed · 56.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $22K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 11 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 3 filing years from 2011 to 2013
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 8/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.