West Virginia Hospital Association
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 550377012
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Charleston, WV, USA
- Phone
- 3043449744
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,022,035
- Expenses
- $4,446,094
- Assets
- $24,050,862
- Liabilities
- $2,191,215
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
25 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- M JAMES KAUFMAN PHD (PRESIDENT & CEO, SECRETARY)
- MELANIE I DEMPSEY (VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCIAL)
- ANTONIOS J GREGORY (VICE PRESIDENT, LEGISLATIVE)
- BRANDON HATFIELD (VICE PRESIDENT, GENERAL COUNSEL)
Highest reported compensation
- M JAMES KAUFMAN PHD (PRESIDENT & CEO, SECRETARY): $831,084 total reported compensation
- MELANIE I DEMPSEY (VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCIAL): $347,313 total reported compensation
- ANTONIOS J GREGORY (VICE PRESIDENT, LEGISLATIVE): $328,301 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The mission of the association is to support its members in achieving a strong, healthy West Virginia: to provide leadership in healthcare advocacy, education, information and technical assistance. To be a catalyst for effective change through collaboration, consensus-building and a focus on desired outcomes.
What it reported doing in 2024
The wvha provides its services to members who in return pay yearly dues. The organization provided members with leadership in health care advocacy, education, as well as information and technical assistance. The organization also served as a catalyst for effective change through collaboration, consensus building and a focus on desired outcomes. Members of the wvha believe it is essential, in the interest of the citizens, of West Virginia, to have a strong, healthcare system that supports and improves the health status of the people served by member hospitals and the economic condition of the state. The wvha seeks to establish and maintain trust among member providers, policymakers, and the public through actions, sensitivity, professionalism, and community-minded commitment to service.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 95% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
- Transparency & Controls: 73
- Accountability: 73
- Sustainability: 70
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: Limited
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 87%; rating input score 87; 24th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 25th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 44
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 26.2%; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.41; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 55.4%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 4.1% per year; rating input score 100; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 48th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
- Governance: 17 of 18 board members independent · 4 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $831K · 25 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 13 of 14 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 9 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 9 not reported.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.