West Virginia Association of School Facility Administrators Corp
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 550762151
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Charleston, WV, USA
- Phone
- 3046689042
- Rating
- 74
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Professional Societies, Associations
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $72,966
- Expenses
- $43,604
- Assets
- $30,668
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KEN HUGHART (PRESIDENT)
- DAVID CRUMM (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- TERRY HOLLANDSWORTH (TREASURER)
- KEN HUGHART (PRESIDENT)
- PRESTON RICHMOND (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Wvasfa organizes and coordinates an annual conference that is held at different locations throughout wv. The annual conference provides vital training and education to West Virginia school facilities administrators and their staff by offering informative presentations on school facility related issues, a trade show to meet helpful vendors that can show off the latest products and services available, and the opportunity to network with other facility professionals. Each delegate member pays dues annually to attend the annual conference. The remainder of the funds are received from vendors for booth rentals at the annual conference. 100 percent of the income received is used to pay for the annual conference and related planning activities and meetings.
What it reported doing in 2024
The annual conference provides vital training and education to West Virginia school facilities administrators and their staff by offering informative presentations on school facility related issues, a trade show to meet helpful vendors that can show off the latest products and services available, and the opportunity to network with other facility professionals.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 81% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 53% for direct work, and 47% for member benefits.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 75
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 66
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.7%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 40.2%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.7; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 59.7% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $44K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 37/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.