West Valley Red Hawks

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
454058896
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2017–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Los Gatos, CA, USA
Phone
4086562895
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Racquet Sports

Reported finances

Revenue
$112,650
Expenses
$110,358
Assets
$24,459
Liabilities
$25

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • GAVIN HERR (President)

People named in this filing

  • ROB BOHN (Chairman)
  • A J O'BRIEN (Treasurer)
  • BILL CLEARY (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The mission of West Valley Red Hawks is to develop a true and lasting love and passion for the game of lacrosse. The Red Hawks are dedicated to developing lacrosse skills, good sportsmanship, teamwork, accountability, and respect in a healthy and fun environment. The Red Hawks is a competitive program that develops players in all aspects of the game.We strive to provide the highest level of coaching instruction at each age level to ensure individual growth in the sport. Respect for the game of lacrosse, teammates, opponents, officials and coaches is the cornerstone of our teaching philosophy. Red Hawks assumes a leadership role within Northern California Junior Lacrosse Association (NCJLA) community for the growth of the sport.

What it reported doing in 2024

West Valley Red Hawks is a non-profit club run by volunteers, parent coaches and paid coaches at the upper levels with significant college and professional playing experience. Both boys and girls programs have teams for 2nd through 8th grade. Our players have played lacrosse at the following high schools: Los Gatos High School, Saratoga High School, Bellarmine, St. Francis and Archbishop Mitty.

Operating model

Revenue model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 38
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2%; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.22; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 51; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -9.6% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.6% per year; rating input score 0; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2017 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 40/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 20/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 51/100.