West Texas Counseling and Guidance
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 751561599
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- San Angelo, TX, USA
- Phone
- 3259442561
- Rating
- 86
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Community Mental Health Center
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $6,883,914
- Expenses
- $7,114,294
- Assets
- $11,361,363
- Liabilities
- $1,577,206
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
22 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CAMILLE SANTRY (2ND VICE PRESIDENT)
- TOM EARLY (3RD VICE PRESIDENT)
- DUSTY MCCOY (CEO)
- NYSSAH D PERRINE (PRESIDENT)
- JOHN AUSTIN STOKES (VICE PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- DUSTY MCCOY (CEO): $123,921 total reported compensation
- DEE A BLASINGAME (CFO): $96,202 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
West Texas counseling & guidance (wtcg) provides high-quality counseling and educational services for all residents of the concho valley, utilizing evidence-based practices that are effective, affordable, and promote personal development and independence. The objective of the organization is to help individuals learn to heal themselves in mind, body, and spirit. As a non-profit, 501(c)(3) organization, wtcg works to ensure that individuals and families seeking counseling have access to those services regardless of their socioeconomic status and ability to pay.
What it reported doing in 2024
Counseling and educational services provided on a fee scale permitting persons from diverse economic status to utilize the center's services. In 2024, 42,438 counseling sessions were provided.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 61% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 82
- Transparency & Controls: 92
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 41
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 86.2%; rating input score 86
- Program expense ratio: 83.2%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: $19.56 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.3%; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.6; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.14; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.1%; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 19.5% per year; rating input score 100; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 25.5% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 86.2% of revenue deployed · 83.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 17 of 17 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $5.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $124K · 22 people listed
- Consistency: 30 of 30 current checks pass
- Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 58/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 23/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 52/100.