West Side Citizens Organization

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
237447142
IRS 990 coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990 2025, Form 990-EZ 2018
Location
St Paul, MN, USA
Phone
6512931708
Rating
80
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Coalitions

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,066,790
Expenses
$683,307
Assets
$1,112,972
Liabilities
$37,107

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MONICA BRAVO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)

Highest reported compensation

  • MONICA BRAVO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $116,164 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

See schedule o.the west side community organization sustains the people of the west side to build community power and to advance more just and equitable community. Wsco also serves as the planning council for st. Paul's district 3 (zip code 55107). Wsco envisions a just, united, self-reliant west side where all of our people are connected, safe, healthy, and successful.

What it reported doing in 2025

See schedule o.program - west side vitalityour long-term vision is a culturally & economically vibrant west side where residents have pathways for democratic participation & tools for self-determination. We envision a neighborhood where residents can afford to live, earn family-sustaining wages, and experience amenities that reflect and celebrate their cultural assets.under this umbrella of west side vitality in 2025; wsco hosted west side voices forums where community came together to break bread, and share insights, build relationships and participate in our hyper local democratic process of organizing on quality of life issues on the west side. In 2025 the voices forums were held in strategic pockets of the neighborhood with 40+ participants at each forum.program - robert street accountability taskforcein 2025 wsco established a cross-sector task force to ensure community accountability, mitigate harm, and prevent displacement before, during, and after the reconstruction of robert street. This model centers residents and locally owned businesses in real-time problem-solving and shared decision-making tied to public investment. Through organizing and public testimony, the task force was embedded in the city's municipal consent resolution and formalized through an mou with mndot, making community accountability a requirement and elevating small business mitigation funds as a city legislative priority. The task force group meets twice a month, and consists of residents, business owners, state and city leaders, mn dot, and other municipalities. Program - southport environmental initiativesouthport environmental initiative is justice focused on an industrial zone on the flats with some of the highest air toxicity levels in the state of mn. Resident leaders are advancing actionable demands with the city, port authority & private corporations. Including the design of an egress route, and a emergency management plan for the southport neighborhood of the west side. Resident leaders meet weekly, with a steady growing number of directly impacted resident households participating. In december of 2025, wsco was able to provide each household with high quality home air purifiers, and emergency shelter in place kits due to the proximity of the hazardous industrial park. Program - west side flats to the futurein 2025, wsco celebrated with the first families to receive the inheritance fund a form of repair from the displacement of the ws flats. Building on wsco's work started in 2023, when wsco commissioned research in action to quantify the immediate and long-term impacts of the displacement of over 2,100 families were displaced off the flats. We gathered the stories of the descendants, publishing an extensive report that, for the first time, publicly acknowledged the magnitude of this loss. The report concluded with community-driven recommendations to chart a course for meaningful repair and prevent further erasure of the west side's cultural assets and legacies. Our efforts here are ongoing. Wsco continues to organize with families directly affected by the displacement of the ws flats.program - west side 10 year planin 2025 wsco engaged residents on the creation of the next 10 year plan for the west side neighborhood. This included multiple stakeholder listening sessions, community engagement in multiple languages, and a range of listening sessions of elders, and youth. The engagement process spanned over the summer of 2025. With robust data from residents, local businesses, community leaders, anchor institutions, and faith communities wsco is now prepared to move into the next phase of the community planning process.program - west side business coalitionin 2025 wsco continued to support the ws small business coalition, by engaging local businesses and supporting leadership, hosting space, securing translation, producing outreach materials, social media, and aligning strategic technical support partnerships.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of total spending goes to programs. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 64
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 65
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 51.2%; rating input score 51
  • Program expense ratio: 79.9%; rating input score 80
  • Fundraising efficiency: $79.91 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 35.9%; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.63; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.03; rating input score 48; 48th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17%; rating input score 21; 21st percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 14.8% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 17% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 23.1% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 51.2% of revenue deployed · 79.9% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $546K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $116K · 14 people listed
  • Consistency: 27 of 27 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 3 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Whistleblower policy not reported.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 58/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 21/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 48/100.