West Sacramento Post No 8762 Veterans of Foreign Wars of the United States

Overview

Mission

Our nbsp; mission nbsp; is nbsp; to nbsp; strengthen nbsp; comradeship nbsp; among nbsp; our nbsp; members nbsp; to nbsp; assist nbsp; worthy nbsp; comrades nbsp; to nbsp; perpetuate nbsp; the nbsp; memory nbsp; and nbsp; history nbsp; of nbsp; our nbsp; dead nbsp; and nbsp; assist nbsp; their nbsp; widows nbsp; and nbsp; orphans nbsp; to nbsp; maintain nbsp; true nbsp; allegiance nbsp; to nbsp; the nbsp; government nbsp; of nbsp; the nbsp; united nbsp; states nbsp; of nbsp; america nbsp; and nbsp; fidelity nbsp; to nbsp; its nbsp; constitution nbsp; and nbsp; laws nbsp; to nbsp; foster nbsp; true nbsp; patriotism nbsp; to nbsp; maintain nbsp; and nbsp; extend nbsp; the nbsp; institutions nbsp; of nbsp; american nbsp; freedom nbsp; and nbsp; defend nbsp; the nbsp; united nbsp; states nbsp; from nbsp; all nbsp; enemies

Operating model

Revenue model

Other-operating. 80% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.

Distribution model

Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

• Financial Efficiency: 0
• Transparency & Controls: 90
• Accountability: 76
• Sustainability: 47
• Growth: 0

Detailed rating inputs

Details

• Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
• Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported
• Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $21K in reported program spending
• Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
• Consistency: 8 of 10 current checks pass · 2 findings to review
• Schedules: 1 filed schedules
• Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
• Contacts: How to reach this organization
• Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
• People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

• High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
• High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
• Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
• Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
• Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Fund balance restriction sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
• High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
• High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
• High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 7/100.
• High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
• Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 59/100.