West Orange Healthcare Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 593269402
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2012–2020
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020
- Location
- Ocoee, FL, USA
- Phone
- 4072961000
- Rating
- 39
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Nonprofit Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $34,334
- Expenses
- $34,334
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mark A Marsh (Director, President)
Highest reported compensation
- Jamal A Hakim MD (Director, VP): $2,615,074 total reported compensation
- Bernadette Spong (Director, Secretary, Treasurer): $2,345,449 total reported compensation
- Gregory P Ohe (FMR DIRECTOR(TERM END 6/1/16)): $1,180,424 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Provision of high quality emergency care services in support of orlando health - health central hospital.
What it reported doing in 2020
West orange healthcare, inc.'s mission is to provide extensive quality emergency care services within the emergency room at orlando health - health central hospital in support of the promotion of health and well-being in the surrounding communities of central Florida. Emergency care services provided for over 61,478 er visits during the fiscal year 2020. West orange healthcare, inc. (woh), no longer employs emergency physicians to run the emergency department at orlando health central, inc. (ohc), the sole member of woh. These services are now outsourced to a subcontracted group of er physicians which handles all of its own physician billing and collects and records revenue associated with the physician billing. Woh still charges their side of the er revenue, but that revenue is recorded under ohc. Please see orlando health, inc. Form 990 for a full description of our health system's efforts during the covid-19 pandemic.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 100% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 25
- Transparency & Controls: 60
- Accountability: 47
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 28.3%; rating input score 28
- Program expense ratio: 28.3%; rating input score 28
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 0 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 0
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Missing
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 25%; rating input score 25; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 78
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 2,052.7%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -42.6% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -34.9% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -41.2% per year; rating input score 0; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 28.3% of revenue deployed · 28.3% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 1 of 4 board members independent · 7 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $10K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $2.6M · 5 people listed · 0 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 39 of 39 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes executive pay
- Filing history: 9 filing years from 2012 to 2020
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Related organizations: 14 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 28/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 28/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Pay-setting controls scored 0/100.
- High — Accountability: Independent voting board scored 25/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 9 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 57/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 1/100.