West Orange Dream Center

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
842007266
IRS 990 coverage
2020–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Winter Garden, FL, US
Phone
407-258-3107
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$299,069
Expenses
$247,438
Assets
$301,290
Liabilities
$617

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

7 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • DAVID OGDEN (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • RAINEY MCFADDEN (EXECUTIVE DI): $43,200 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Empowered by the Gospel, West Orange Dream Center commits to building trust within our community and fostering generational impact by addressing educational and vocational needs, creating meaningful relationships, and instilling biblical principles. Through partnerships, we strive to create a healthy, interconnected community rooted in the transformative love of the gospel.

What it reported doing in 2024

Youth and senior programming in 2024, we supported children and teens through afterschool programming that fostered literacy, mentorship, and personal growth. For elementary and middle school students, we partnered with eight waves, a nonprofit that provided reading-focused curriculum and volunteers. We offered the facility and connection to the community, enabling their team to reach families in the neighborhood. For teens, we ran a separate program in collaboration with community partners, offering a safe environment for mentorship, enrichment activities, and relationship-building. For senior citizens, we operated the dream kings and queens program, which met weekly for fellowship, a shared meal, and engaging activities. Recognizing that many of our seniors live alone and face challenges related to food insecurity and social isolation, we combined community-building efforts with practical support-often supplementing their needs through our supply pantry. Throughout the year, we collaborated with other organizations to host a stem fair, summer camps, and weekend community activities that brought joy and enrichment to local families. One of our key initiatives supports children with incarcerated parents, providing wraparound mentorship and care for both the children and their families-including celebrations such as birthdays and holiday gifts they might not otherwise receive. Many of the programs offered at our facility are made possible through partnerships with other nonprofits, who rely on our space and community connections to reach residents. In addition to these partnerships, we also operate our own programs that respond directly to the needs of our neighborhood. We are proud to serve as a hub for meaningful relationships, education, and emotional support for all ages.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 97% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and a large share of available resources goes toward mission work. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 65
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 90
  • Sustainability: 55
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 67.9%; rating input score 68
  • Program expense ratio: 81%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 6 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 75
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 17.3%; rating input score 70; 70th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.22; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 17.5%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 47th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 11.8% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 49.8% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 9 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 67.9% of revenue deployed · 81% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 6 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $200K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $43K · 7 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 46/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 22/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 54/100.