West Linn-wilsonville Education Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
943137045
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2013–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Tualatin, OR, USA
Phone
5036737000
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Labor Unions

Reported finances

Revenue
$100,345
Expenses
$59,540
Assets
$174,190
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

5 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Matt Bell (President)
  • Karen Christenson-Niebur (Vice President - Primary)
  • CJ Koll (Vice President - Secondary)

People named in this filing

  • Matt Bell (President)
  • Karen Christenson-Niebur (Vice President - Primary)
  • CJ Koll (Vice President - Secondary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

West Linn Wilsonville Ed. Association promotes the improvement of the status of educators and strives to develop and maintain improved working conditions in the West Linn/Wilsonville school district 3JT. Included in this process is the representation of members in collective bargaining with public employers and representation of members with regard to the terms of our agreed upon contract with our employers.

What it reported doing in 2024

West Linn-Wilsonville Ed. Association continuously studies the challenges of the education profession and promotes quality teaching and sound educational programs for all youth. This includes encouraging and fostering self-improvement in education. Creation of goodwill between educators and members of the community are also vital roles of the association.

Operating model

Revenue model
Membership-supported. 98% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 80
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 40.7%; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.93; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 15.3%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 46th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 6.6% per year; rating input score 100; 50th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2013 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 5 filed money-flow records
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.