West Katy Islamic Center
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 884136457
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- West Katy, Texas, USA
- Phone
- +83 332321321
- Rating
- 53
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Islam
- Affiliation
- Islam
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $688,951
- Expenses
- $171,444
- Assets
- $858,223
- Liabilities
- $135,928
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Mohamed Abdul Rasheed (President, Trustee)
People named in this filing
- Mohamed Abdul Rasheed (President, Trustee)
- Aftab Silat (Trustee)
- Farhan Silat (Trustee)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The West Katy Islamic Center (WKIC) is organized for religious, charitable, and educational purposes to serve the Muslim community. The WKIC shall engage in the propagation of Islam, including establishing a place of Islamic worship, religious learning, and community services. In addition, the WKIC shall provide religious and social services to all Muslims.
West Katy Islamic Center (WKIC) is a religious, charitable, and educational organization serving the Muslim community in West Katy, Texas. It provides a place of Islamic worship, daily prayers, Quran classes, and outreach programs. WKIC also offers Islamic marriage ceremonies (Nikaah) and confidential counselling for individuals, couples, and families. The center is committed to strengthening faith and community bonds through worship, education, and social services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 8
- Transparency & Controls: 84
- Accountability: 76
- Sustainability: 84
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 4%; rating input score 4
- Program expense ratio: 15.9%; rating input score 16
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 83.3%; rating input score 83; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 85.9%; rating input score 86; 36th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 3 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 43
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 75.1%; rating input score 97; 97th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 5.01; rating input score 85; 85th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.16; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 81; 81st percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 101.8% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 122.6% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 4% of revenue deployed · 15.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 10 of 10 board members independent · 3 of 7 filing controls reported · 4 of 6 affiliation controls reported
- Programs: Filed program service accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 16 of 19 current checks pass · 3 findings to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes grants
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 4 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 4/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 16/100.
- Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Functional expense sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part IX AllOtherExpenses column sum did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 35/100.