West Jackson County Fire Department
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 474358683
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2019–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Ocean Springs, MS, USA
- Phone
- 2283245084
- Rating
- 61
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Fire Prevention
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $191,008
- Expenses
- $151,379
- Assets
- $438,265
- Liabilities
- $787
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
2 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EDWARD FLAGG (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- EDWARD FLAGG (PRESIDENT)
- JOHN T WADE (TREASURER)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The following are the purposes for which this organization has been organized: the purpose of the organization is to protect life and property in every capacity of the departments training and abilities; and the suppression of all forms of fire that may occur in the area bounded as follows; beginning at the intersection of interstate 10 and the western boundary of jackson county and following the western boundary of jackson county in a northerly direction to the northwest corner of section 3, township 7 south, and range 9 west, thence easterly along the northern boundary of sections 3, 2 and 1 of township 7 south, and range 9 west, and section 1 and 6 of township 7 south, and range 8 west to the northeast corner of section 6, township 7 south, and range 8 west; thence in a southerly direction along the eastern boundary of section 6 and 7, township 7 south, and range 8 west to the northern right-of-way of interstate 10; thence in an easterly direction along the northern right-of-way of
What it reported doing in 2024
The protection of life and property in every capacity of the departments training and abilities; and the suppression of all forms of fire that may occur in the area bounded
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 99% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 37
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Accountability: 64
- Sustainability: 69
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 38.1%; rating input score 38
- Program expense ratio: 48.1%; rating input score 48
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 13th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 1 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 14
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 20.7%; rating input score 74; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.9; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 14.6% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 14.4% per year; rating input score 100; 81st percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 30.4% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 38.1% of revenue deployed · 48.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 50 of 5 board members independent · 1 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $73K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 2 people listed
- Consistency: 18 of 19 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2019 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 38/100.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 48/100.
- High — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 6 not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Independent members within voting members did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 55/100.