West Islip Creative Arts Company Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
471037743
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2014–2020
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2020
Location
West Islip, NY, USA
Phone
5167795087
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Dance

Reported finances

Revenue
$108
Expenses
$19,258
Assets
$36,107
Liabilities
$165

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • DANIELLE GALLAGHER (OFFICER)
  • ROBIN MUELLER (OFFICER)
  • JOSEPH ROHAN (OFFICER)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2020. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The corporation is formed to be a recreational enrichment program promoting creative, cultural and the performing arts, providing exposure and performance opportunities for the residents and students of the west islip, New York community, regardless of their ability to pay, through the sponsorship of theatrical productions, concerts, dance recitals, musicals, and student based creative arts exhibits. Additionally, the corporation is formed to provide community service and mentoring opportunities for young adults in the community.

What it reported doing in 2020

A recreational enrichment program promoting creative, cultural and the performing arts.

Operating model

Revenue model
Investment-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from recurring investment income.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 84
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 27
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 57.2%; rating input score 57

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -17,731.5%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.87; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 40; 40th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -14.7% per year; rating input score 0; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -16.1% per year; rating input score 0; 24th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.7% per year; rating input score 100; 70th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 57.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $11K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2014 to 2020
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 57/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 40/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
  • High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.