West Hartford Land Trust Inc C/o David Sagers
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 043724571
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2022–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990 2020, Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- West Hartford, CT, USA
- Phone
- 8609657124
- Rating
- 56
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Environmental Beautification and Aesthetics
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $1,161
- Expenses
- $416
- Assets
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- DAVID SAGER (PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- DAVID SAGER (PRESIDENT)
- DIANE MACK (TRUSTEE)
- PETER PARIZO (TRUSTEE)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To engage and promote the preservation, improvement, study, protection and conservation of natural resources, including natural, scenic and historic sites, primaily in west hartford for the benefit of the community.
What it reported doing in 2022
To preserve and protect open space in and aroung west hartford.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and assets have declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 37
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 51
- Growth: 40
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 22%; rating input score 22
- Program expense ratio: 61.5%; rating input score 62
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 64.2%; rating input score 94; 94th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: 22.8% per year; rating input score 100; 90th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -23% per year; rating input score 0; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 22% of revenue deployed · 61.5% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $256 in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 5 of 5 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 22/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.