West Genesee Track and Field Booster Club Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 922991769
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- Camillus, NY, USA
- Phone
- 3157177936
- Rating
- 40
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Single Organization Support
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $10,394
- Expenses
- $6,026
- Assets
- $15,175
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Heather Fettig (Director & Vice President)
- John Maupin (President)
People named in this filing
- Michael Palmisano (Director)
- Heather Fettig (Director & Vice President)
- Christopher Fietze (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are a public charity with a charity status of 50s(a)(2). The purpose for which the Corporation is formed are: (a) To support the West Genesee High School Track and Field program and enhance educational and athletic opportunities for students by uniting high school students, parents, coaches, faculty and staff to promote strong moral character, academic excellence, good sportsmanship and fundraising; provided, further, that the corporation shall not have the purposes or powers set forth in Subsections (a) through (v) of Section 404 of the New York Not-For-Profit Corporation Law (the "N-PCL").
What it reported doing in 2025
We were able to support athletes with needs for track and field. We funded children with footwear and clothing as needed and supported invitational fees, senior gifts, uniforms, and implements needed for track and field. Athlete trophies were also purchased.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Other-operating. 60% of the money available for current operations came from other operating revenue.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 76
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 42%; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.52; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -150% per year; rating input score 0; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 25.2% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.9% per year; rating input score 100; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.