West Central Initiative

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
363453471
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-T 2023
Location
Fergus Falls, MN, USA
Phone
2187392239
Rating
79
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Community Foundations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$16,024,793
Expenses
$11,792,919
Assets
$96,470,939
Liabilities
$2,290,826

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

19 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • ANNA WASESCHA (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • ANNA WASESCHA (PRESIDENT): $210,752 total reported compensation
  • REBECCA PETERSON (DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT): $121,043 total reported compensation
  • GREGORY WAGNER (DIRECTOR OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT): $109,744 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Serving to improve west central Minnesota through funding, programs, and technical assistance. Vision of a vibrant, inclusive, and sustainable world starts here in west central Minnesota.

What it reported doing in 2024

Programs and outreach: our early childhood initiative is a network of parents, educators, businesses, community leaders, faith leaders, and policymakers joined in a long-term effort to prioritize the care and development of young children. Two important facets of our early childhood initiative include our early childhood dental network and early childhood mental health network. Both programs take a collaborative approach to help ensure our children get the care they need and deserve. We completed the climate action plan for west central Minnesota in spring of 2023, and we are now focused on putting it into action through staffing and outreach, with the goal of creating a sustainable and respected environment for the future. In september 2024, we sponsored more than 30 welcoming week events in our region to welcome and celebrate newcomers of all backgrounds. Our live wide open program showcases the opportunities, natural amenities, and diverse individuals in west central Minnesota, aiming to inspire a sense of belonging and attract people to the region. Our rural democracy program, in a region considered leadership distressed, offers training to individuals considering running for office, engages historically excluded groups in civic processes, and supports local leaders in participating in local government and nonprofits. Our climate and sustainability program coordinated a solar purchasing campaign in partnership with solar united neighbors that educated 100 residents about solar opportunities for their homes; supported 10 communities in in developing small-scale solar and energy resilience projects that have direct community benefits, leveraging public and philanthropic funds; convened monthly meeting and events with regional stakeholders around climate action opportunities from the mn region 4 climate action plan.

Operating model

Revenue model
Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 68% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and some filed totals do not add up.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 71
  • Transparency & Controls: 70
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 84
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 73%; rating input score 73
  • Program expense ratio: 78.2%; rating input score 78
  • Fundraising efficiency: $10.02 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.4%; rating input score 94; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Missing
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 85.8%; rating input score 86; 18th percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 9 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 26.4%; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 8.18; rating input score 90; 90th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.6%; rating input score 55; 55th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 6.7% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5.9% per year; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 73% of revenue deployed · 78.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 9 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $9.2M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $211K · 19 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 35 of 36 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 8 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 189 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 185 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 38/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 55/100.