West Bergen Housing for Mental Health Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
222379139
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2024
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Ridgewood, NJ, USA
Phone
2014443550
Rating
72
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Residential Mental Health Treatment

Reported finances

Revenue
$115,557
Expenses
$91,336
Assets
$231,034
Liabilities
$25,389

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

12 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • CHRISTINE KEARNEY (PRESIDENT)
  • MICHAEL TOZZOLI (CEO)

People named in this filing

  • KEVIN GIANGRASSO (TRUSTEE)
  • PETER HUGHES (TRUSTEE)
  • JORDAN KAUFMAN (TRUSTEE)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

West bergen housing for mental health, inc. (the "corporation") is a not-for-profit corporation organized under the laws of the state of New Jersey and is exempt from federal income taxes under internal revenue code 501(c)(3).the corporation operates a seven-unit housing project, number 031-eh054 (the "project"), in midland park, New Jersey. The project is supported primarily by tenant rental payments and rental supplement payments from the united states department of housing and urban development ("hud").the corporation is also subject to a section 8 housing assistance payments contract with hud, and a significant portion of the corporation's rental income is received from hud.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 78% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and program spending has declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 52
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 71
  • Growth: 40

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 47.7%; rating input score 48
  • Program expense ratio: 60.2%; rating input score 60

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 21%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.53; rating input score 86; 86th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.11; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -5.5% per year; rating input score 0; 19th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 1.3% per year; rating input score 100; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -1.4% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 47.7% of revenue deployed · 60.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $55K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 15 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 48/100.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 23/100.