West Bay Pilipino Multi-Services Inc

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
942448381
IRS 990 coverage
2016–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2015
Location
San Francisco, CA, USA
Phone
4154316266
Rating
88
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Standard
Sector
Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Prevention Only

Reported finances

Revenue
$1,428,152
Expenses
$2,212,359
Assets
$9,328,981
Liabilities
$11,318,271

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

9 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Genevieve Jopanda (President)
  • Henry Sears (Vice President)
  • Chris Foley (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Carla Laurel (Executive Dir.): $147,135 total reported compensation
  • Lucille Yu (Finance): $124,112 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Provide culturally sensitive services to enhance the quality of life of underserved youth, seniors and their families

What it reported doing in 2024

Provide culturally sensitive services to enhance the quality of life of underserved youth, seniors and their families. The organization provides various program activities within one program. These activities include: academic enrichment - the organization provides free after school programming focusing on academic enrichment, mentorship, and filipino cultural values. The academic enrichment activities aim to support youth academically, socially, emotionally, and culturally and promote college readiness. Mentorship - the academic mentors are called kuyas and ates, meaning older brother and older sister. The activity indirectly and directly shares the consistent message to youth that they are all going to college because their kuyas and ates are or have been in college. Also, the academic mentors teach the importance of giving back to the community.college preparatory -the college preparatory activities overall goal is to promote college readiness for high school aged youth in soma. The organization is providing holistic culturally sensitive enrichment support, ancillary academic support service workshops, social emotional and culturally sensitive support workshops, financial literacy workshops, professional, career and leadership development opportunities and college field trips. Family support - case management services are offered for youth and their parents. Byhelping the youth succeed, the organization helps the families to become socially, emotionally, and financially stable. Senior support - these activities focus on improving quality of life and making healthy lifestyle choices through food distribution, health and wellness workshops, and recreational activities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 64% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 81
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Accountability: 95
  • Sustainability: 30
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 71.6%; rating input score 72
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.34 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 14; 14th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -54.9%; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 4.22; rating input score 82; 82nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.21; rating input score 4; 4th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 12.3%; rating input score 30; 30th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 26.9% per year; rating input score 100; 88th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.4% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 34% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 71.6% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $147K · 9 people listed
  • Consistency: 29 of 29 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 9 filing years from 2016 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
  • Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 14/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 3/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 4/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 30/100.