West African Stroke Initiative Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 922431199
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2024–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6314664355
- Rating
- 60
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Brain Disorders
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $49,756
- Expenses
- $57,257
- Assets
- $157
- Liabilities
- $3,000
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Uchenna Okafo (CEO & Co-Founder)
People named in this filing
- Uchenna Okafo (CEO & Co-Founder)
- Onome H Osokpo (CSOO & Co-Founder)
- Mary Okafo (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The primary mission of West African Stroke Initiative Inc.(WASI) is to facilitate world-class comprehensive stroke care, including evidence-based culturally attuned care transitions in West Africa for stroke patients and their caregivers
What it reported doing in 2025
(1) WASI hosted five Grand Rounds on the following: New Frontiers in Acute Mechanical Thrombectomy, From the Brain to the Pelvis, Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography, ICU Management in Neurointervention, and Paediatric Neurointervention: VOGM (2) WASI presented at five national and international conferences: AfriHealth Conference and Exhibition in Port-Harcourt, Nigeria; Nigerian Academy of Neurological Surgeons, Enugu, Nigeria; Nigerian Stroke Leaders Summit, Lagos, Nigeria; African Stroke Organization Conference, Nairobi, Kenya; Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology Conference in Orlando Florida. (3) The WASI team completed three endovascular treatments, including a Pial AV fistula and a Caroticocarvernous fistula and provided practical hands-on opportunities for the WASI fellows
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 79% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - Most voting board members are independent and program spending has grown recently. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and the filing reports few safeguards for money sent abroad.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 51
- Transparency & Controls: 55
- Accountability: 88
- Sustainability: 26
- Growth: 80
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 59.7%; rating input score 60
- Program expense ratio: 51.9%; rating input score 52
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Scored; rating input score 0
- Grant itemization coverage: Scored; rating input score 0
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 71
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -15.1%; rating input score 38; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 6; 6th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 19.11; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 176.1% per year; rating input score 100; 99th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 150.5% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -187% per year; rating input score 0; 0th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 59.7% of revenue deployed · 51.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 5 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $30K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 17 of 17 current checks pass
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and foreign activity
- Filing history: 2 filing years from 2024 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Foreign activity oversight scored 0/100.
- High — Transparency & Controls: Grant itemization coverage scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 38/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Independent financial-statement audit not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 6/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 58/100.