The Wessyngton Plantation African American Preservation Association

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
824617046
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2020–2025
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2021
Location
Springfield, TN, USA
Phone
6153825486
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Historical Societies, Related Historical Activities

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$0
Expenses
$0
Assets
$5,232
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • John Baker (President)
  • J Mark Lowe (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • John Baker (President)
  • J Mark Lowe (Vice President)
  • Cindy Darden (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To preserve and maintain the cemetery and all fencing and monuments located on the site of Wessyngton Plantation, Cedar Hill, Robertson County, Tennessee in which former enslaved people of African American descent and certain of their descendants are buried. To preserve the history of the enslaved African American people who lived and worked on the site of the Wessyngton Plantation located in Robertson County, Tennessee. To preserve the culture, stories, and landmarks that emanate from the history of the enslaved people who lived and worked on the site of the Wessyngton Plantation. To promote and develop educational programs related to the Wessyngton African American Cemetery and the history and culture of the enslaved people who lived and worked at the Wessyngton Plantation. To gather information, develop projects, and preserve the history of the Wessyngton Plantation.

What it reported doing in 2025

We maintained the Historic Cemetery and provided Educational Tours and Activities within our mission.

Operating model

Revenue model
No positive adjusted resources. The filing reports no positive adjusted operating resources.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 55
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 20

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 66.7%; rating input score 67; 1st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: -67% per year; rating input score 0; 6th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -43.5% per year; rating input score 0; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 22.4% per year; rating input score 100; 86th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 4 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 3 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Series filing activity did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.