WesleyLife
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 300577845
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2011–2024
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2010
- Location
- Johnston, IA, USA
- Phone
- 5152716789
- Rating
- 49
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Support Services
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $12,494,516
- Expenses
- $13,160,720
- Assets
- $20,328,014
- Liabilities
- $26,930,043
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
21 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROB KRETZINGER (PRESIDENT & CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- ROB KRETZINGER (PRESIDENT & CEO): $960,534 total reported compensation
- ALLISON MERCURIS PENDROY (COO): $427,232 total reported compensation
- CRAIG FLANAGAN (CFO): $374,066 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Guided by Christian compassion, we support the independence, health, and well-being of older adults wherever they call home.
What it reported doing in 2024
Wesleylife was established in december 2010 as a supporting organization for wesley retirement services, inc. (wrs) and wesley community services, inc. (wcs). Wrs was established in 1947 (originally as wesley acres, inc.) as a faith-based non-profit organization, and has since dedicated itself to providing housing, healthcare, and support services exclusively to older adults in ways that enhance a sense of purpose and meaning in the lives of those we serve. Wcs was established in 2005 to provide services to older adults as well as those in financial need through home healthcare, non-medical in-home services, nutrition, transportation, and hospice services. We also offer adult day services in two markets: des moines and newton.wesley development services was created in february 2011 to provide market research as well as project design, management, monitoring, and marketing related to new communities for wesleylife and its affiliates. As trends in retirement living continue to change, we have responded with services and programming designed to meet the needs of a younger, more active customer.wesleylife currently owns and operates eight communities for healthy living in Iowa through wesley retirement services, inc. (wrs) that offer a full continuum of services. Those communities are: wesley on grand in des moines; halcyon house in Washington; heritage house in atlantic; the village in indianola; park centre in newton; edgewater in west des moines; hearthstone in pella; and brio of johnston in johnston, Iowa.in 2024, wesley rretirement service and wesley community service provided housing and services for nearly 13,000 residents, clients and participants throughout the organization and more than 2,000 dedicated and passionate team members. Guided by our organizational core values of quality, excellence, hospitality and innovation, we are committed to responsible stewardship of our residents' resources to improve the lives of those we serve. As a non-profit organization, we understand our responsibility and obligation to operate with transparency, honesty, and integrity in all we do.community benefits from 2024 include:- wesleylife provided $6,860,400 in benevolent care to our residents, participants and clients. Residents who depleted their financial resources through no fault of their own received $3,691,183 of charitable assistance through each community's good samaritan or good shepherd fund to allow them to remain in their apartments or townhomes. Clients and participants of wesley community services received $267,304 in charitable donations to help them remain independent at home.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 24
- Growth: 60
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0.1%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0.1%; rating input score 0
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.3%; rating input score 92; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 4 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 67
- Compensation committee: Pass
- Independent consultant: Pass
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Pass
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -5.3%; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.54; rating input score 52; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 1.32; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 14.9%; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -13% per year; rating input score 0; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 6.3% per year; rating input score 100; 55th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 16.3% per year; rating input score 100; 83rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
- Where the money goes: 0.1% of revenue deployed · 0.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 13 of 13 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $14K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $961K · 21 people listed · 4 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $1.8M reported
- Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 8 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 16/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 52/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 3/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 8/100.