Welty Homes

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
550362615
IRS 990 coverage
2010–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Wheeling, WV, US
Phone
(304) 242-5233
Rating
82
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Supportive Housing for Older Adults
Affiliation
Christianity

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$31,238,827
Expenses
$30,430,392
Assets
$96,126,219
Liabilities
$1,195,206

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

16 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • MOST REV MARK E BRENNAN (PRESIDENT)

Highest reported compensation

  • MORGAN MURPHY (ADMINISTRATOR (AS OF 3/1/2024)): $253,439 total reported compensation
  • ELEANOR REXROAD (ADMINISTRATIVE RN): $188,345 total reported compensation
  • DEBORAH MALENA (NURSE - RN): $162,857 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The not-for-profit Welty Corporation offers a range of residential and care options for people over 65.

What it reported doing in 2024

The welty retirement apartments continued to provide a housing alternative, with increased security, comfort and specialized services, for the elderly who wish to be relieved of the burden of maintaining a free standing residence, but who do not have a desire or a need for custodial type of care offered at the welty home, allowing them to love independently and age (in place) to avoid the common situation where the elderly decline in physical and emotional health by being isolated in a single family home which is not physically suited to their needs and which they are physically unable to maintain. The welty retirement apartments provide a proper residential environment for the aged with special support services such as a secure building equipped with fire alarm, smoke detection, sprinkler system, elevator, central call system, grab bars and other specialized equipment and facilities for the aged. In addition, at no extra cost, the welty apartments provide a limited level of medical supervision by a registered nurse, 24 hour coverage by personnel available to respond to the call system, all at a location convenient to transportation, shopping, hospitals and churches. Services also include transportation services, cleaning services and meal services to the residents of the apartments. If an applicant or a resident is unable to pay the full amount of rental charges, welty retirement apartments, lc has adopted a charitable subsidy policy to assist such applicants or residents. The welty retirement apartments, lc also continued to operate 23 apartments (the braddock apartments) for the elderly. The braddock apartments continued to provide cost effective housing to its residents as well as expanded services such as transportation services, housecleaning services, dietary services and limited nursing services. Priority in admission is given to applicants who have a spouse or other loved one residing at good shepherd nursing home. Due to the support of the diocese of wheeling-charleston and the capital support of the clara welty trust, the welty home for the aged, inc. Has been able to continue to expand its charitable mission for the aged of Ohio county West Virginia without incurring substantial debt or operating deficits, while providing its employees with good working conditions, competitive wages and one of the highest levels of health care and other employee benefits in the geriatric care industry in West Virginia.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 97% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 80
  • Transparency & Controls: 74
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 61
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 87.9%; rating input score 88
  • Program expense ratio: 92.3%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 62nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Missing
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Pass
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Pass
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.6%; rating input score 45; 45th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.16; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 3.9%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.7% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 5% per year; rating input score 100; 43rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 9.3% per year; rating input score 100; 61st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 6 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 87.9% of revenue deployed · 92.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 4 filed program accomplishments · $28.1M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $253K · 16 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Highest-paid contractors: 5 contractors listed · $2.6M reported
  • Consistency: 34 of 34 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 7 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 5 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 45/100.