Wellsprings Friends School

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
931123932
IRS 990 coverage
2012–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Eugene, OR, USA
Phone
5416861223
Rating
77
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$847,595
Expenses
$774,714
Assets
$615,306
Liabilities
$310,949

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Lisette Ewing (President)

Highest reported compensation

  • Dante Zuniga-West (Head of School): $82,398 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Wellsprings provides alternative learning approaches, supportive community, and a culture of individual affirmation, in which teenagers are mentored and assisted towards meeting the challenges of adolescence and adulthood.

What it reported doing in 2024

1. Provided an alternative, personalized and strength-based education to an eclectic community of 71 students, the majority referred to us from 4 districts in Lane County. Matriculated 21 graduates. 28% of the students were IEP/504 special needs.2. With the help of Glen Creek Investments LLC, our school was able to complete a much-needed refinance, stabilizing our reserves and putting us on firmer financial ground. Our staff retention efforts received a major boost with a $40,000 grant from the James F. and Marion L. Miller Foundation, ensuring that the compassionate educators who make Wellsprings shine can continue their work without interruption. In addition, we were honored to receive a $1,500 grant from Women's Gift and another $5,000 grant from our partners at the Chambers Family Foundation, which will help us begin replacing our outdated Chromebooks.3. From Family Night in the fall to our all-school pumpkin patch field trip, students, staff, and families made memories together. The annual Trunk-or-Treat was a howling good time, complete with creative costumes and spooky fun. Our Community Dinner in Fall featured delicious home-cooked favorites like stuffing, sweet potatoes, and pies, thanks to our amazing staff, students, families, and Board. The debut of the wellSPRING Celebration in May was a creative showcase of what makes our school so special. From student artwork and performances to live music by the Whiteaker Hot Club, it was a memorable highlight!4. Thanks to support from the Cow Creek Band of Umpqua Tribe of Indians and generous donors, our dream of a permanent outdoor classroom came to life. The project is complete with new garden beds and native plants that fill the area with life and purpose. The outdoor classroom isn't just a structure in the wetlands - it's an instrumental part of our campus, reinforcing Wellsprings' values of experiential learning, community involvement, and honoring the natural environment.5. Out front, a new sign was installed that more accurately explains what Wellsprings does and what we stand for.6. We continued our collaboration with HOOTS to provide on-site counseling and medical advice to our students on a walk-in basis once a week.7. Provided local non-profit, Huerto De La Familia, two garden plots on our property for use by local Latino families. Continued to provide use of our building outside of school hours to several non-profits and other volunteer community organizations.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 85% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 70
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 74
  • Sustainability: 44
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 74.2%; rating input score 74
  • Program expense ratio: 81.3%; rating input score 81
  • Fundraising efficiency: $4.36 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 15; 15th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 38
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 8.6%; rating input score 58; 58th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.79; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.51; rating input score 16; 16th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 10.6%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 4.5% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 4.3% per year; rating input score 100; 39th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -2.1% per year; rating input score 0; 12th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 74.2% of revenue deployed · 81.3% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 3 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $630K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $82K · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 28 of 28 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 12 filing years from 2012 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 7 not reported.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 15/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 58/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 35/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 16/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 35/100.