Wellness Task Force - Maui

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
333292978
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Wailuku, HI, USA
Phone
8087279079
Rating
44
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Reported finances

Revenue
$30,374
Expenses
$4,088
Assets
$26,286
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jan Pontanilla (President)
  • Analise Farmer (Vice President)
  • Christina Bonacorsi (Vice President)

People named in this filing

  • Jan Pontanilla (President)
  • Analise Farmer (Vice President)
  • Christina Bonacorsi (Vice President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We are committed to supporting the well-being of our law enforcement professionals by promoting physical, mental, and emotional wellness. Through education, wellness initiatives, stress management resources, and access to healthy meal options, we strive to foster resilience, enhance work-life balance, and create a culture of self-care within our department. We recognize the unique challenges of law enforcement and are dedicated to providing accessible support, tools, and programs that empower our personnel to thrive both on and off duty. Together, we are strengthening our department by prioritizing the well-being of those who serve.

What it reported doing in 2025

The Wellness Task Force opened the BZ Market at the Maui Police Department's Wailuku Station in August 2025. Healthy, portion controlled meals along with snacks and drinks were available to purchase by personnel 24 hours a day, 7 days a week helping to promote healthy eating throughout the day. Both fresh and frozen meals are available. Meals are available to a staff of around 450.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 67% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 86
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 86.5%; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.43; rating input score 87; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.