Well Within

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
061721815
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2010–2011
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2011
Location
Woodbury, MN, USA
Phone
6514513113
Rating
84
Verdict
STRONG
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Health Support Services

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$62,196
Expenses
$103,234
Assets
$199,965

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

8 people listed

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2011. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To offer innovative programs, support and services to those who seek well-being and healing of body, mind and spirit.

What it reported doing in 2011

Alternative health care, general: with the help of more than 110 volunteers who contributed over 1000 service hours, well within offered integrative healing services, classes & workshops, support groups and presentations on health and wellness topics to the wider community. All these programs support individuals seeking greater balance and wellness in their lives. Integrating body, mind, emotions and spirit is essential to healing. Well within offers a variety of approaches to explore an individuals healing journey, as well as powerful tools for doing the inner work that so often accompanies a health crisis. Being part of a supportive and healing community also develops within the network of the center. Well within was honored to help 2,440 individuals in 2011 to live as fully as possible with serious illnesses and other challenging life situations. Our outreach program provided free healing touch sessions, stress reduction retreats and other programs to low income/homeless populations, including in spanish to hispanic women within their own communities. Outside presentations in 2011 were given at Minnesota & hematology, pa, healtheast care systems, breast cancer awareness conference, and numerous churches and hospitals. Additionally, an average of approximately 19,000 listeners tuned in to our hope, healing and well being internet radio show each week.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and assets have declined or grown slowly.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 91
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 24
  • Growth: 80

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
  • Program expense ratio: 76.2%; rating input score 76

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -66%; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.94; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 29.8% per year; rating input score 100; 79th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 54.3% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: -18.5% per year; rating input score 0; 23rd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 76.2% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $79K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 8 people listed
  • Consistency: 6 of 6 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2010 to 2011
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 10/100.
  • High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.