The Well Mind Project

Legal name: Well Mind Project

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
884334215
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2023–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2024
Location
Seattle, WA, USA
Phone
(801) 867-2452
Rating
36
Verdict
REVIEW
Rating confidence
Limited
Sector
Human Service Organizations

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$250
Expenses
$0
Assets
$250
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

1 person listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Liz Galloway (Founder and President)

People named in this filing

  • Liz Galloway (Founder and President)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

We are dedicated to creating a world where everyone has the tools and support they need to nurture their mental health and lead fulfilling lives. By partnering with established organizations and offering scholarships, we empower individuals to access a range of resources and services designed to foster well minds and resilient spirits.

What it reported doing in 2024

Public Support The organization is in place to be able to receive public support including from events, fundraisers, individuals and businesses for community support, and with the continued focus on growth and bringing in in kind partnerships to support this and produce the non profit first event and fundraising efforts publicly this will grow and all the organization to provide the said scholarships and program services to individuals and couples to support mental health and attend wellness and mental health retreats, and continue even more fundraising efforts, partnerships and growth. This is still in ongoing progress and as a newer non profit with the director in ongoing duties these accomplishments are to be determined.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue has grown recently. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 8
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: Limited
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: Limited
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 68; 68th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: Limited

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 200% per year; rating input score 100; 100th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 2 operating locations identified
  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 1 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 1 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 2 filing years from 2023 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.