Welcome House

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
430984039
IRS 990 coverage
2011–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Kansas City, MO, US
Phone
816-472-0760
Rating
76
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Alcohol, Drug Abuse, Treatment Only

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$4,036,888
Expenses
$3,920,878
Assets
$13,841,700
Liabilities
$3,824,683

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

14 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jamie Boyle (President and CEO)

Highest reported compensation

  • Jamie Boyle (President and CEO): $178,084 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The Welcome House is committed to providing a high-quality, moral and open residential program to recovering alcoholics and drug-addicted men facing the difficult transition from treatment, incarceration and homelessness to reintegration back into society as productive citizens.

What it reported doing in 2024

In 2024, the Welcome House program directly served 675 men in the residential sober-living recovery program. At admission, and upon entering the program, all new residents were struggling with active drug and/ or alcohol addiction (13.97% alcoholism, 32.24% drug addiction, 53.79% both alcoholism and drug addiction). A significant number were also dealing with associated problems such as poverty, homelessness, mental illness, legal consequences and marital or family issues. 80.33% of the residents reported prior incarceration and a few were court-ordered to complete the program. All fell into one or more of the following categories: son, grandson, brother, father, husband, uncle, or grandfather. The following program and recovery accomplishments were achieved in 2024: * 466 Intakes * 675 Men Served * Collected $811+K in Program Participation Fees * Continued to Employee Men in the Rehabilitative Jobs Program (via 23-25 short-term program and facility support positions) * Program Participants earned $48+K in Room and Board Days by Participating in the "Jumpstart" emergency employment assistance programs * Provided Residents and Welcome House Alumni with Access to More Than 2,000 Twelve Step Recovery Meetings and Rehabilitative Classes * Continued Ancillary Programs such as: Thrive Aftercare (for recent program graduates) & Restore (for resident family, loved ones and significant others) * Earned almost $635+ in Operational Grant Awards * Continued delivering the "New Program Paradigm" based on best and evidence-based practices, incorporating clinical assessments and referrals, technology, and a collaborative continuing care team approach. According to the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA), the critical demand for addiction services is evident through record-breaking call volumes to crisis hotlines and a historical increase in the number of overdose-related deaths, alcohol-related traffic deaths, and suicide attempts. Numerous studies indicate that intensive residential programs lasting more than three months, coupled with evidence-based, wrap-around support services, are the linchpin for ensuring self-sustainability and lifelong sobriety. In addition to directly supporting the men residing in the facility and participating in the recovery program, the impact of the Welcome House program is significant and far-reaching: Saving Lives: We provide a lifeline to individuals battling addiction, offering them the tools and resources needed to overcome their challenges and regain control of their lives. Access to such intervention programming can mean the difference between life and death for many. Reducing Healthcare Costs: Addiction recovery can lead to significant cost savings in the long run. Treating health-related issues early at our Recovery Center can prevent costly emergency room visits, hospitalizations, and other healthcare expenses associated with untreated conditions. Economic Productivity: Individuals in recovery can become productive members of society, contributing to the workforce, and reducing the economic burden of addiction-related unemployment and dependence on public assistance programs. Strengthening Communities: Communities thrive when individuals in recovery are successfully reintegrated. With our rehabilitative programs, we help reduce crime rates, improve neighborhood safety, and foster a sense of social cohesion. Breaking the Stigma: Supporting individuals with substance use disorders and their loved ones sends a powerful message that addiction is a health issue deserving of compassion and treatment, rather than stigma and discrimination. Over the past 12 months, the Welcome House continued to execute the facility improvement and program alignment strategic plan. This plan included addressing existing capacity and physical/ structural constraints, completing a $14.2M+ capital campaign and finishing the new building construction and existing facility demolition. Welcome House o

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 66% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Hybrid. The nonprofit split its reported program spending across 64% for direct work, and 36% for grants.
  • Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 63
  • Transparency & Controls: 77
  • Accountability: 100
  • Sustainability: 54
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 64.6%; rating input score 65
  • Program expense ratio: 65.4%; rating input score 65
  • Fundraising efficiency: $13.15 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 47; 47th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 94.7%; rating input score 95; 25th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: 2 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Compensation committee: Pass
    • Independent consultant: Missing
    • Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
    • Written employment contract: Missing
    • Compensation survey or study: Pass
    • Board or committee approval: Missing
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: 96.6%; rating input score 97; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Pass
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Pass
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 2.9%; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 3.53; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.28; rating input score 36; 36th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 4.5%; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 16.1% per year; rating input score 100; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 18.5% per year; rating input score 100; 87th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 27.1% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 3 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
  • Where the money goes: 64.6% of revenue deployed · 65.4% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 12 of 12 board members independent · 8 of 8 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.6M in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $178K · 14 people listed · 2 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
  • Consistency: 39 of 40 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 10 filed schedules · includes major donors, grants, and executive pay
  • Filing history: 13 filing years from 2011 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 2 filed related-organization links
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 47/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 44/100.
  • Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 36/100.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 57/100.