Welcome Home Ministries
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 621515995
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2025
- Official website data refreshed
- Jul 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Nashville, TN, United States
- Phone
- 615-309-7087
- Rating
- 76
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Arts, Cultural Organizations - Multipurpose
- Affiliation
- Christianity
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,213,622
- Expenses
- $1,467,852
- Assets
- $3,814,905
- Liabilities
- $821,165
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
10 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KURT KOEHN (PRESIDENT)
- DARYL MURRAY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/FOUNDER)
- KYLE DUVALL (DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
Highest reported compensation
- DARYL MURRAY (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR/FOUNDER): $127,897 total reported compensation
- KYLE DUVALL (DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $110,076 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Welcome Home Ministries is a compassionate, abstinence-based, recovery housing community dedicated to helping men transition from substance use disorder to a life of healing and wholeness. Combined costs savings when including reductions in health care costs as a result of treatment, which includes recovery support, the investment yields up to $12 savings for tax payers for every dollar invested in treatment (NIDA). Our mission To enter into worlds of brokenness in order that all might experience wholeness in Jesus Christ. Alicia Woods is a graduate of Auburn University (BS), Auburn, AL, where she received a Computer Science degree. She has much experience in computer software support and testing. Alicia joined our staff in 2014.
What it reported doing in 2025
Welcome home ministries was formed in 1992 as a not-for-profitorganization to provide physical, emotional, and/or spiritualsupport to individuals at their point of need, including recovery housing and substance use disorder supportive services.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and most voting board members are independent. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 58
- Transparency & Controls: 86
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 65
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 55%; rating input score 55
- Program expense ratio: 82.9%; rating input score 83
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 92.9%; rating input score 93; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 7 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 88
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Fail
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 33.7%; rating input score 84; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 2.6; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.22; rating input score 34; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 16.2%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 8.3% per year; rating input score 100; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 5.3% per year; rating input score 100; 40th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 7.9% per year; rating input score 100; 49th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 5 programs and campaigns described on the official site · 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 55% of revenue deployed · 82.9% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 8 of 8 board members independent · 7 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1.2M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $128K · 10 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 24 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 6 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 16 filing years from 2010 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 2 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 55/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Audit committee oversight not reported.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 20/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 34/100.