Wedgwood PTA
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 911260518
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2024–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Seattle, WA, USA
- Phone
- 2063553384
- Rating
- 70
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $121,143
- Expenses
- $232,261
- Assets
- $144,559
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
7 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Emily Moses (President)
- Tracy Melary (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Kayela Beatty (Treasurer)
- Allison Darling (Treasurer)
- Suhas Joshi (Director)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
A 100 volunteer based organization of parents who partner with school staff and administration to enhance the learning experience of the students at Wedgwood Elementary School in Seattle, Washington. The PTA supports teachers, staff, and families to provide a high quality education and nurturing environment. Our mission is to support the social, academic and physical needs of each child. to encourage the excellence of our educators with financial and volunteer support. Also to enrich our community of families through communications and activities.
What it reported doing in 2024
Teacher/Staff/Classroom support support for the Teachers and staff at Wedgwood Elementary as they interact with students in the classroom. This category includes: 1 Teacher's supply fund so that the teachers can buy general supplies, books and materials required to teach their grade level 2 Teacher Professional Development for education and training on our new curriculum 3 New library books, 4 Drawing Artist and art supplies, 5 Special Projects
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of total spending goes to programs and some filed totals do not add up.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 75
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 92.2%; rating input score 92
- Program expense ratio: 48.1%; rating input score 48
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -91.7%; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.62; rating input score 44; 44th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -2.2% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 4.2% per year; rating input score 100; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 92.2% of revenue deployed · 48.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 4 filed program accomplishments · $112K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 7 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 48/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 1/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 44/100.