Webster Groves Skatesmen Hockey Club
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 863351306
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2021–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2024
- Location
- Webster Groves, MO, USA
- Phone
- 3147496161
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Amateur Sports
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $110,949
- Expenses
- $110,402
- Assets
- $43,406
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- ROBERT WICHARD (PRESIDENT)
- DAN EGLEY (VICE PRESIDENT)
People named in this filing
- ROBERT WICHARD (PRESIDENT)
- ANDREW PIERCE (SPECIAL EVENTS)
- SARA LUCAS (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The oranization is organized exclusively for charitable, religious, educational and scientific purposes under section 501(c)(3) of the internal revenue code, or corresponding sections of any future federal tax code. The organization will organize and govern high school ice hockey team(s) in the webster groves district to participate in the mid states high school club hockey association (mscha) or other hockey associations.
What it reported doing in 2024
To provide high school ice hockey players the opportunity to continue development of individual and team hockey and life skills and provide an avenue to compete with other Missouri ice hockey teams.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Membership-supported. 76% of the money available for current operations came from membership dues.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 42
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.1%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 80.2%; rating input score 80
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.5%; rating input score 35; 35th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.39; rating input score 32; 32nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 76; 76th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 11.4% per year; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 38.1% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.1% of revenue deployed · 80.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $89K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2021 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 35/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 32/100.