Weac Region 7

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
391175604
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Brookfield, WI, USA
Phone
2627896000
Rating confidence
Limited

Reported finances

Revenue
$951,427
Expenses
$1,024,481
Assets
$606,464
Liabilities
$139,697

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

17 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • RACHEL SWICK (PRESIDENT (THRU SEPT))
  • CARRIE KUMMROW-MIHAS (VICE PRESIDENT)
  • KATIE WILKES-YUNDT (PRESIDENT (BEG SEPT))

Highest reported compensation

  • RACHEL SWICK (PRESIDENT (THRU SEPT)): $5,954 total reported compensation
  • GAIL KABLAU (SECRETARY/TREASURER (THRU SEPT)): $1,624 total reported compensation
  • CARRIE KUMMROW-MIHAS (VICE PRESIDENT): $1,082 total reported compensation

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

To provide a governance structure through which member local associations may cooperatively provide services for their members.

What it reported doing in 2024

The purpose of weac region 7 is to provide a governance structure through which member local associations may cooperatively provide services for their members and carry out the following objectives: provide assistance in obtaining improved wages, hours, and working conditions to school personnel represented by member local associations; promote positive public attitudes toward school personnel and education; work through local units, weac, and nea to elect candidates for public office who will support the goals of school personnel and education; improve, develop, and enforce high standards of hiring, reassigning, or retaining persons in education; defend the employment rights of school personnel; secure passage of bills which enhance education; work to eliminate discrimination and demoralizing practices against school personnel and children; implement other priorities as established by the region; to facilitate the exchange and improve the quality of education in areas of curriculum and instruction.

Operating model

Revenue model
Earned-program. 84% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
Distribution model
Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.

The verdict

- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: NotEnoughData
  • Transparency & Controls: 92
  • Accountability: 66
  • Sustainability: 28
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: Limited
  • Program expense ratio: Limited
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
  • Governance controls: 3 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 33
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
    • Whistleblower policy: Fail
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: Fail
    • Other executive compensation review process: Fail
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -7.7%; rating input score 20; 20th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.59; rating input score 27; 27th percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.23; rating input score 29; 29th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 1%; rating input score 60; 60th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: 3% per year; rating input score 100; 31st percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 3.6% per year; rating input score 100; 32nd percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: Financial trends and filed revenue, expense, asset, and liability detail
  • Governance: 8 of 9 board members independent · 3 of 9 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $6K · 17 people listed
  • Highest-paid contractors: 1 contractor listed · $739K reported
  • Consistency: 11 of 12 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 5 filed schedules · includes major donors
  • Filing history: 16 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
  • Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Accountability: Governance controls: 5 of 8 not reported.
  • Review — Transparency & Controls: Schedule R controlled transactions itemized did not reconcile in the filed values.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 20/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 27/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 29/100.