We Share Foundation
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 526053649
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2015–2018
- Forms available
- Form 990 2014, Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2018
- Location
- Washington, DC, USA
- Phone
- 2023319694
- Rating
- 72
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Scholarships, Student Financial Aid Services, Awards
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $32,952
- Expenses
- $31,230
- Assets
- $10,716
- Liabilities
- $91,488
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
6 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- EMILIE SIMON (President)
- BRENDA CHERRY (Vice President)
- LUZ MARINA GONZALEZ (Vice President)
- JAN RHODES (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- NANCY FITZPATRICK (Executive Dir.)
- EMILIE SIMON (President)
- CAROL PATIN (Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We share foundation is focused on expanding the charitable efforts of quota international, supporting humanitarian and educational initiatives of volunteers serving deaf, hard-of hearing, women and children with urgaent needs in local communities around the world.
What it reported doing in 2018
The award winning hand-in- hand world service program funds 21 quota international service projects in 5 countries fiji, india, malaysia, philippines and suriname. These programs are run by lovcal quota members who recognize the specific needs of deaf and hard-of-hearing individuals and women and children in their own communities.projects include learn to earn, we share bakery, building bridges for the deaf, stitch for a living, vocational training and special education, healthcare assistance, daycare centers for malnourished children, preschool and home for the aged, and rural development initiatives
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Program spending has declined or grown slowly and revenue has declined or grown slowly.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 74
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 72.8%; rating input score 73
- Program expense ratio: 76.8%; rating input score 77
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 5.2%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.34; rating input score 23; 23rd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 8.54; rating input score 1; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -35.6% per year; rating input score 0; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -14.6% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -23.4% per year; rating input score 0; 9th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.8% of revenue deployed · 76.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $24K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 8 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2015 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Related organizations: 1 filed related-organization link
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
Grant-readiness screening is separate from the live rating, not a measure of program quality. Review the source records before making a grant decision.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 23/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 56/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 1/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.
- High — Grant Readiness: Automatic revocation: this organization had its federal tax-exempt status automatically revoked.