We Must Vote Action Fund

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
934377376
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2025–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025, Form 990-N 2024
Location
Jackson, MS, USA
Phone
6012080983
Rating
40
Verdict
MIXED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Civil Rights

Reported finances

Revenue
$70,000
Expenses
$150,000
Assets
$0
Liabilities
$75,500

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Dorothy Johnson (President)

People named in this filing

  • Dorothy Johnson (President)
  • Gregory Smith (Treasurer)
  • Lorenzo Evans Jr (Secretary)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The purpose of our organization is to ensure communities understand the power and importance of their vote. Our target audiences are underserved communities of people who have never or rarely voted, and those who are justice-impacted. We help individuals take advantage of the opportunity to allow their voices to be heard through civic engagement. We Must Vote Action Fund has an emphasis on African-Americans in rural communities, who have limited access to resources, therefore limiting their ability to access pertinent information in a timely manner.

What it reported doing in 2025

We Must Vote Action Fund has lobbied at the State Capital for the restoring of rights to persons re-entering society after being incarcerated and serving their prescribed time, as well as for those who were falsely imprisoned and later released after evidence proved they were not guilty. We also provided training in rural areas about justice and rights restoration, as well as general reasons and the importance of votijng to youth and those living in rural communities.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.

The verdict

MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 0
  • Transparency & Controls: 100
  • Sustainability: 5
  • Growth: NotEnoughData

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
  • Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: -114.3%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 3; 3rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 23.3%; rating input score 7; 7th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: Limited
  • Revenue growth: Limited
  • Asset growth: Limited

Details

  • Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 1 filing year from 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
  • High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 7/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 3/100.
  • High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 7/100.