We Are Her
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 825076645
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2023–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025, Form 990-N 2022
- Location
- Cedar Hill, TX, USA
- Phone
- 4696615391
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Alliance/Advocacy
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $250,137
- Expenses
- $234,444
- Assets
- $42,808
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- LaWanda Campbell (President)
- Barbara Weeks (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- LaWanda Campbell (President)
- Barbara Weeks (Vice President)
- RiShada Maxie (Secretary)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
At the heart of our mission beats a resolute commitment: to magnify leadership, unleash potential, and elevate the voices of women and girls across diverse backgrounds, particularly those in underserved communities.
What it reported doing in 2025
Grief is a profoundly personal and challenging journey, particularly when it comes to the loss of a child or the death of a parent or sibling for a young person. Our program Why ME? recognizes the unique needs and experiences of mothers grieving the loss of a child and youth who have lost a parent or a sibling. Our program is structured to provide a holistic approach to grief support, encompassing various elements that cater to the emotional, psychological, and social needs of participants. Our program includes psychoeducational workshops and seminars that focus on understanding grief, managing emotions, enhancing resilience, and promoting self-care. These educational sessions equip participants with knowledge and skills to navigate their grief journey more effectively. We engage with the community through outreach programs, awareness campaigns, and partnerships with local organizations to raise awareness about grief, mental health, and the importance of supportive resources for individuals and families facing loss. Central to our program is a strong focus on mental health, recognizing that grief can significantly impact one's emotional well-being and psychological resilience. We collaborate with mental health professionals, psychiatrists, and counselors to provide comprehensive mental health assessments, screenings, and interventions as needed. Our goal is to address underlying mental health issues, such as depression, anxiety, PTSD, and complicated grief, and ensure that participants receive appropriate treatment and support. We have assisted over 412 participants who have experienced positive changes in various aspects of their lives, including emotional healing, improved coping skills, and improved mental help. Our commitment to addressing mental health alongside grief ensures that participants receive holistic care that honors their emotional well-being and fosters long-term recovery and growth.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and total assets are small relative to annual expenses; liquid coverage is unknown.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 76
- Transparency & Controls: 85
- Accountability: 82
- Sustainability: 44
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 75.1%; rating input score 75
- Program expense ratio: 80.2%; rating input score 80
- Fundraising efficiency: $41.36 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 71; 71st percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 15th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 64th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 6.3%; rating input score 50; 50th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.18; rating input score 11; 11th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 77; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 67; 67th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 0.1% per year; rating input score 100; 29th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 2.6% per year; rating input score 100; 34th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 42.5% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 75.1% of revenue deployed · 80.2% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 4 of 4 board members independent · 4 of 7 filing controls reported
- Programs: 3 filed program accomplishments · $188K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors
- Filing history: 3 filing years from 2023 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 11/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 50/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule A contributions reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.