Wb Community Health
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 061494220
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2010–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024
- Location
- Cranston, RI, USA
- Phone
- 4014994291
- Rating
- 84
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Management & Technical Assistance
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $137,047,780
- Expenses
- $138,599,430
- Assets
- $48,308,041
- Liabilities
- $13,843,109
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
15 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- KELLI RUSS (VICE PRESIDENT)
- SARAH MANGIARELLI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- JOSEPH BALDUCCI (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- SARAH MANGIARELLI (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $140,000 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To manage and operate certain health benefit projects entered into by and among the corporation and certain participating municipalities and school districts in the state of Rhode Island.
What it reported doing in 2024
Operate and manage the health and dental benefits provided by participating member municipalities and school districts. The corporation manages the benefits program to enable the participating members to realize the maximum savings on health and dental costs. During fiscal 2021 the corporation managed health and dental benefits for 18 members consisting of local municipalities and school districts.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Earned-program. 99% of the money available for current operations came from fees and other program revenue.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 89
- Transparency & Controls: 90
- Accountability: 79
- Sustainability: 21
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 99.8%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: Limited
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 68th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Limited
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 4 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 50
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Fail
- Whistleblower policy: Fail
- Document-retention policy: Fail
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -1.1%; rating input score 22; 22nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.35; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.29; rating input score 57; 57th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: Limited
Growth
- Program expense growth: 2.1% per year; rating input score 100; 16th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 1.2% per year; rating input score 100; 9th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 3.1% per year; rating input score 100; 21st percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.8% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 15 of 15 board members independent · 4 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $138.3M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $140K · 15 people listed
- Consistency: 23 of 24 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Filing history: 14 filing years from 2010 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 4 of 8 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 22/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 12/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Schedule D expense reconciliation did not reconcile in the filed values.
- Review — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 57/100.