Wayne County Public Library

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
560530244
IRS 990 coverage
2009–2024
Official website data refreshed
Sep 2026
Forms available
Form 990 2024
Location
Goldsboro, NC, USA
Rating
60
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate

Official website

Reported finances

Revenue
$396,487
Expenses
$200,916
Assets
$3,003,813
Liabilities
$0

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

4 people listed

People named in this filing

  • MARY BARTLETT (CHAIR)
  • JOHN WALSTON (VICE CHAIR)
  • LESLIE WEIL (VICE CHAIR)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

Our Library is Preparing for the Future

What it reported doing in 2024

The wayne county public library foundation, inc., along with the leadership of library director and assistant director led two significant projects in this fiscal year. Four years ago, efforts were begun to purchase a mobile library for wayne county. The mobile library was funded by the foundation as the lead funder along with funding from an lsta federal grant and some funds from the county of wayne. After several years of delays from the manufacture of the mobile library the delivery to the library was in the spring of 2024. The mobile library is a state-of-the-art mercedes sprinter van which includes a canopy for programming outside. Since the arrival of the van, there have been children's programming in the summer at regularly scheduled stops along with stops for adults. The mobile library serves to reach populations who cannot ordinarily visit the three county libraries. The foundation provided funds for materials for the mobile library. The foundation also supported the new program, the learning studio, for school aged children from grades 1-8 with dyslexia, adhd, and other learning differences. The program included materials in the libraries along with programming in the school year for children and their families. During the summer there was a free program for students identified forty-eight in the wayne county public schools who were below grade level and would benefit from certified tutors in a summer program. An lsta grant paid for the programming and furniture. First christian church provided space that was upfitted for the tutoring with was held in the church over an eight- week period in the summer of 2024. The foundation provided financial and volunteer support for the summer and during the school year. The program continued during the school year with tutoring in the evenings in the fall and spring semesters with certified teachers in the evenings monday- thursday for two hours each evening. The foundation also funded the steel shade structure in the bill smith learning garden which was dedicated in october 2024. In the garden visitors can learn about the environment, mindfulness, agriculture, and more. Summer programs for students were held in the garden. The foundation sponsored the creative aging program for patrons over age 55 which included a watercolor art class, line dancing, quilling , and memoir writing. The foundation sponsored scholarships for staff members working on master's in library science degrees along with internships for the local history department at the library.

Operating model

Revenue model
Affiliate-supported. 89% of the money available for current operations came from contributions from related organizations.
Distribution model
Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 59
  • Transparency & Controls: 80
  • Accountability: 24
  • Sustainability: 88
  • Growth: 60

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 51%; rating input score 51
  • Program expense ratio: 91.7%; rating input score 92
  • Fundraising efficiency: Limited

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 88.9%; rating input score 89; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Pay-setting controls: Limited
  • Foreign activity oversight: Limited
  • Grant itemization coverage: Limited
  • Major donor itemization: Limited
  • Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

  • Independent voting board: Limited
  • Governance controls: 4 of 7 controls in place; rating input score 57
    • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
    • Whistleblower policy: Pass
    • Document-retention policy: Pass
    • CEO compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
    • Form 990 shared with the board: Fail
    • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
    • Audit committee oversight: Missing
    • Independent financial-statement audit: Fail

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 49.3%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 14.95; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 80; 80th percentile among comparable filings
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 13.2% per year; rating input score 100; 76th percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: -10.7% per year; rating input score 0; 5th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 7.6% per year; rating input score 100; 58th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • What they do: 10 programs and campaigns described on the official site
  • Where the money goes: 51% of revenue deployed · 91.7% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: 4 of 7 filing controls reported
  • Programs: 2 filed program accomplishments · $184K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
  • Consistency: 15 of 16 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
  • Schedules: 3 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 14 filing years from 2009 to 2024
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 51/100.
  • Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 6 not reported.
  • High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
  • Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Independent members within voting members did not reconcile in the filed values.