Waves for Change Foundation Ltd
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 811814068
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2017–2022
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2022, Form 990-N 2016
- Location
- Jacksonville Beach, FL, USA
- Phone
- 6466414762
- Rating
- 35
- Verdict
- REVIEW
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Swimming & Other Water Recreation
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $25,420
- Expenses
- $25,000
- Assets
- $1,474
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
3 people listed
People named in this filing
- Matthew Mattila (Board Member)
- Tim Conibear (Founder)
- Joseph Piaker (Board Member)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2022. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Since 2009, we have worked with Universities, children and young people to develop a community based, child-friendly mental health service. Through published, participatory research, our Surf Therapy programme has been co-designed with children and youth alongside supervision from local mental health experts. Together we have created an innovative programme that is both child and youth friendly and evidence based.
What it reported doing in 2022
Waves for Change's Surf Therapy is a community-based mental health service to children and young people from underserved communities. We use the positive health benefits and rush of surfing with mind-body therapy to help young people build protective relationships, identify and regulate emotions, self-soothe and build a positive image of their future. Facilitated by young people from the same communities: 43 caring coaches 2034 Participants! We now work with almost 40 partners in 11 countries including a headline partnership with Elman Peace and UNICEF in Somalia. Our goal next year is to package our programme and training tools so that more and more partners can use them to bring a mental health focus to their youth programming. Due to the success of programmes with neurodiverse groups, we have now established and maintained relationships with other government and community-based referral partners, including Schools for Learners with Special Educational Needs, local hospitals (Department of Health), local social workers and Child and Youth Care Centres (Department of Social Development), schools for differently abled youth and those at risk of exclusion (Department of Education). As of February 2022, we now reach 250 neurodiverse and high-need participants in our service annually. These participants are referred by key government departments and community mental health role-players. This now represents 13% of our total participant population every year. We believe this work contributes to our aim to relieve the burden on the mental health system and making sure our service reaches the children that need our support the most. Produced a Learning brief which highlights our effectiveness. All 233 participants in the study endorsed extremely high rates of exposure to violence, such that 100% of participants had witnessed violence, and all but 2 participants (98.2%) had directly experienced violence. The key findings of the study shared by Van der Merwe confirmed the effectiveness of Surf Therapy and the 5 Pillar Method in key mental health prevention and promotion outcomes, listed as essential by the Departments of Health and Social Development in services and solutions to reduce the treatment gap in CAMH services. These outcomes included improved social connectedness, reduced impulsivity and more adaptive sensation seeking (such as bravery) rather than maladaptive (such as seeking danger). The study confirmed that the W4C's Surf Therapy programme is an efficacious, trauma-informed intervention for violence-exposed children and youth. W4C Surf Therapy and the underpinning 5 Pillar Method therefore presents an exciting model for scale, which could provide an essential solution for huge treatment gaps in South Africa, to ensure we respond to the crisis in CAMH, and are not found wanting again... Source: Annual Report
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
REVIEW - The filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 40
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 1.7%; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.06; rating input score 8; 8th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 69; 69th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: -27.9% per year; rating input score 0; 14th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: -18.9% per year; rating input score 0; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -18.8% per year; rating input score 0; 10th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 3 people listed
- Consistency: 8 of 9 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2017 to 2022
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Growth: Program expense growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 8/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 49/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.