Waukesha County Community Dental Clinic Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 300436162
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990 2025
- Location
- Waukesha, WI, USA
- Phone
- 2625227645
- Rating
- 78
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Health Treatment Facilities, Primarily Outpatient
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $3,325,493
- Expenses
- $3,454,674
- Assets
- $4,334,358
- Liabilities
- $401,811
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
16 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- SCOTT MARSHALL (CEO)
Highest reported compensation
- SIDNEY EBERT (DIRECTOR OF DENTAL SERVICES): $204,275 total reported compensation
- SCOTT MARSHALL (CEO): $159,366 total reported compensation
- EMILY KABITZKE (DENTIST): $138,070 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Community smiles dental improves the lives of the underserved through oral healthcare services, preventive education, and advocating for systemic healthcare change, because everyone deserves a healthy smile.
What it reported doing in 2025
Community smiles dental served 4,861 unique patients in 2025. Of those served, 27% of patients were new to csd and found long-awaited dental care at csd clinics. In total, the organization provided a total value of care of $4.1 million in 2025. Programming continues to focus on children (89%), pregnant moms, individuals with special health needs, and some adult care, treating those who would likely have nowhere else to turn for dental treatment.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Mixed. Its operating money came from several sources; no one source provided a clear majority.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
- Includes noncash contributions: Reported contributions include donated property or goods.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Fundraising costs are high for each dollar raised and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 79
- Transparency & Controls: 70
- Accountability: 95
- Sustainability: 28
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 87.8%; rating input score 88
- Program expense ratio: 84.1%; rating input score 84
- Fundraising efficiency: $5.9 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 19; 19th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: 1 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 17
- Compensation committee: Missing
- Independent consultant: Missing
- Other Form 990s reviewed: Missing
- Written employment contract: Missing
- Compensation survey or study: Missing
- Board or committee approval: Pass
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: Limited
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 8 of 9 controls in place; rating input score 89
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Pass
- Other executive compensation review process: Fail
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Pass
- Independent financial-statement audit: Pass
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -3.9%; rating input score 17; 17th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.25; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.09; rating input score 49; 49th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 17.7%; rating input score 18; 18th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 13.4% per year; rating input score 100; 71st percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.8% per year; rating input score 100; 77th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 8.7% per year; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 87.8% of revenue deployed · 84.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 9 of 9 board members independent · 8 of 9 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.9M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $204K · 16 people listed · 1 of 6 pay-setting controls reported
- Consistency: 36 of 36 current checks pass
- Schedules: 7 filed schedules · includes major donors and executive pay
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2020 to 2025
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 4 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
- Staff and benefit plans: Retirement and health plans the organization files with the Department of Labor, and the people in them.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Fundraising efficiency scored 19/100.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 17/100.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: Other executive compensation review process not reported.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 42/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 18/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 49/100.