Watersheds United Vermont Inc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 831625362
- IRS 990 coverage
- 2020–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2024, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Montpelier, VT, USA
- Phone
- 8027933887
- Rating
- 91
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Standard
- Sector
- Water Resource, Wetlands Conservation and Management
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $2,399,616
- Expenses
- $2,661,668
- Assets
- $510,633
- Liabilities
- $413,587
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
8 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CAROLYN MUNNO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR)
- LINDSEY WIGHT (PRESIDENT)
Highest reported compensation
- CAROLYN MUNNO (EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR): $91,340 total reported compensation
Source: IRS Form 990. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Wuvs mission is to empower community-based watershed groups in all parts of the state to protect and restore vermonts waters.
What it reported doing in 2024
Watersheds united Vermont (wuv) worked in 2024 to further our mission of empowering community-based watershed organizations to protect and restore vermonts waters. Wuv focused on three main areas: providing resources, training and information to watershed groups, facilitating connections and collaboration among watershed groups and partners, and acting as a voice for groups at the state level. Wuv continues to operate subgrant programs for watershed organizations and partners for: riparian buffer planting, clean water project development, clean water project design and implementation, dam removal design and implementation, capacity building, watershed planning and education and outreach. Most of these programs were funded through the Vermont department of environmental conservations block grant program. The private organization pur projet also contributed funds for wuv to subgrant to support tree planting in Vermont and the fidelity charitable trust contributed funds fof an education and outreach subgrant program. Wuv also worked with the Vermont community foundation to support their healthy watersheds initiative by working with 12 watershed groups across Vermont on projects to work towards healthy watersheds and resilient communities. Additionally, wuv sent out weekly messages to the wuv listserv (200+ people) on events, trainings, funding opportunities, and policy announcements. Wuv held four webinars for watershed groups and partners and one in person meeting on technical and organizational topics in part focused on flood recovery and resilience after vermonts devastating flood in july of 2023. Wuv participated in a weekly water caucus to bring the voice of community-based watershed groups to a statewide coalition. Wuv continued to provide general guidance to watershed groups to help support groups in their watershed restoration efforts.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Grant-funded. 91% of the money available for current operations came from government grants.
- Distribution model
- Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 92% of its reported program spending out as grants.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Some filing-based governance responses are negative or unanswered and expenses are high relative to revenue.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 100
- Transparency & Controls: 95
- Accountability: 84
- Sustainability: 16
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
- Program expense ratio: 99.6%; rating input score 100
- Fundraising efficiency: $4,677.61 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 99; 99th percentile among comparable filings
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 91.7%; rating input score 92; 7th percentile among comparable filings
- Pay-setting controls: Limited
- Foreign activity oversight: Limited
- Grant itemization coverage: 99.2%; rating input score 99; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
- Related-party transparency: Limited
Accountability
- Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
- Governance controls: 5 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 62
- Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
- Whistleblower policy: Pass
- Document-retention policy: Pass
- CEO compensation review process: Fail
- Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
- Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
- Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
- Audit committee oversight: Missing
- Independent financial-statement audit: Fail
Sustainability
- Operating margin: -10.9%; rating input score 12; 12th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.19; rating input score 5; 5th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.81; rating input score 10; 10th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 3.4%; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 37.8% per year; rating input score 100; 95th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 38.2% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 29.7% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 100% of revenue deployed · 99.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: 7 of 7 board members independent · 5 of 8 filing controls reported
- Programs: 1 filed program accomplishment · $2.6M in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $91K · 8 people listed
- Consistency: 21 of 22 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 4 filed schedules · includes major donors and grants
- Filing history: 4 filing years from 2020 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 36 filed money-flow records
- Related organizations: 34 filed related-organization links
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Accountability: Governance controls: 2 of 7 not reported.
- High — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 12/100.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 5/100.
- Review — Transparency & Controls: Domestic grant itemization did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 10/100.