Watchmen Consulting
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 334642482
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2025–2025
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2025
- Location
- North Augusta, SC, USA
- Phone
- 6262216759
- Rating
- 43
- Verdict
- MIXED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Protestant
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $45,344
- Expenses
- $19,746
- Assets
- $25,598
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Christopher Caraza (Executive Director/Board Secretary)
- Joshua Wilkerson (Board President)
- Darren Turner (Board Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Christopher Caraza (Executive Director/Board Secretary)
- Joshua Wilkerson (Board President)
- John Barrett (Board Treasurer)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Watchmen Consulting serves to reducing hazards and risk to nonprofit organizations by providing intelligence and security consulting services. To do this, Watchmen Consulting will perform intelligence analysis, produce intelligence and security reports and white papers, conduct briefings based off said intelligence analysis, provide physical security consulting and training, and staff operations coordination.
What it reported doing in 2025
Watchmen Consulting conducted several key risk assessment and reduction consultations to nonprofit organizations. During operations conducted by these nonprofit organizations, Watchmen provided near real time intelligence monitoring, informing these organizations as security situations evolved. Post operation debriefings and assessments were conducted.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
- Distribution model
- No current program activity. The filing reports no program spending for the current year.
The verdict
MIXED - The filed numbers largely add up and revenue comfortably covers expenses. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and a relatively small share of total spending goes to programs.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 100
- Sustainability: 67
- Growth: NotEnoughData
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 0%; rating input score 0
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 56.5%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.3; rating input score 54; 54th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0; rating input score 66; 66th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 63.7%; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: Limited
- Asset growth: Limited
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of revenue deployed · 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 9 of 9 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 0/100.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 54/100.
- High — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 2/100.