Watch
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 411720822
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2019–2019
- Forms available
- Form 990 2018, Form 990-EZ 2019
- Location
- Minneapolis, MN, USA
- Phone
- 6123412747
- Rating confidence
- Limited
- Sector
- Women's Service Clubs
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $51,755
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
4 people listed
People named in this filing
- KRISTIN STASTNY (CHAIR)
- APRIL SPAS (VICE CHAIR)
- ERIN HUSTAD (SECRETARY)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2019. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
Watch's mission is to make the justice system more effective and responsive in handling cases of domestic violence and juvenile sex trafficking, to improve outcomes for women and children who have been victimized, and to create a more informed and involved public. Watch envisions a judicial system that consistently treats women and children subjected to violence and sex trafficking fairly, expeditiously, and effectively so that victims are given the opportunity to rebuild their lives in safety and achieve stability and success. Watch's work leads to greater safety and stability for victims of violence and greater accountability for violent offenders, and raises public awareness about the prevalence and consequences of domestic violence and sex trafficking.
What it reported doing in 2019
Watch distributed all of the cash to the advocates for human rights (36-3292374).
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 27
- Transparency & Controls: 74
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 0
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 72.6%; rating input score 73
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 90%; rating input score 90; 1st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -14.9% per year; rating input score 0; 20th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: -15.2% per year; rating input score 0; 13th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 72.6% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $38K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 4 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: Resolved incoming and outgoing counterparties from filed money flows.
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- High — Growth: Asset growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.