Wat Prachum Raingsey Buddhist Association
Legal name: Wat Prachum Raingsey Buddihist Assoc
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 912160527
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2014–2018
- Official website data refreshed
- Sep 2026
- Forms available
- Form 990-EZ 2018, Form 990-N 2011
- Location
- Yelm, WA, United States
- Rating
- 79
- Verdict
- SUPPORTED
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
- Sector
- Buddhism
- Affiliation
- Buddhism
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $100,161
- Expenses
- $57,491
- Assets
- $398,547
- Liabilities
- $9,936
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
13 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- CHHETH CHUON (President)
- BOTUM HUON (Vice President)
- HOM EY (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- CHHETH CHUON (President)
- TITHIA SUM (Director)
- BOTUM HUON (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2018. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
We are a Cambodian Buddhist Temple located in Yelm, Washington.
What it reported doing in 2018
1.religious organization supported by cambodians to seek worship of buddha2. To maintan khmer culture and to support the cambodian community
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 73
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 85
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 57.4%; rating input score 57
- Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 42.6%; rating input score 92; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 6.93; rating input score 98; 98th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.02; rating input score 46; 46th percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 64; 64th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 33.5% per year; rating input score 100; 89th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 17.7% per year; rating input score 100; 84th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.8% per year; rating input score 100; 36th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- What they do: 1 operating location identified
- Where the money goes: 57.4% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $57K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 13 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 2 filed schedules
- Filing history: 5 filing years from 2014 to 2018
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Review — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 57/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 46/100.