Washtenaw Contractors Association Foundation

Nonprofit profile at a glance

EIN
843248337
IRS 990-EZ coverage
2019–2025
Forms available
Form 990-EZ 2025
Location
Ann Arbor, MI, USA
Rating
75
Verdict
SUPPORTED
Rating confidence
Moderate
Sector
Student Sororities, Fraternities

Reported finances

Revenue
$2,180
Expenses
$1,000
Assets
$12,357

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Amounts in USD.

Leadership & pay

6 people listed

Executive titles in this filing

  • Jerald Brand (DirectorVice President)
  • Jody Humphries (Executive Director)

People named in this filing

  • Theodore Barker (DirectorPresident)
  • Jerald Brand (DirectorVice President)
  • Michael Everett (Director)

Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.

Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2025. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.

Overview

Mission

The organization will support and will be operated to exclusively for the benefit of to perform the functions of or to carry out the purposes of the Washtenaw Contractors Association Inc. the supporting organization. The organization will only engage in activities that both support the supported organization and further the charitable scientific or education purposes. The organization will support the supported organization to introduce and attract individuals to pursue those careers and the education they require. Specific activities may include programs such as career expositions career fairs job fairs and scholarships for students pursuing careers in the construction industry.

What it reported doing in 2025

Funding to Just Build It Expo which provides a one day construction workforce development program for 8-12 grade students from SE Michigan. Number of students exceeded 1300 and funding assisted in school travel vouchers and student lunches.

Operating model

Revenue model
Donor-supported. 100% of the money available for current operations came from contributions and gifts.
Distribution model
Grant intermediary. The nonprofit sent 100% of its reported program spending out as grants.

The verdict

SUPPORTED - A large share of total spending goes to programs and the filed numbers largely add up. A relatively small share of available resources goes toward mission work and reported officer compensation is a large share of total spending, which may reflect staffing concentration.

Rating breakdown

  • Financial Efficiency: 66
  • Transparency & Controls: 82
  • Sustainability: 77
  • Growth: 100

Detailed rating inputs

Financial Efficiency

  • Mission deployment rate: 45.9%; rating input score 46
  • Program expense ratio: 100%; rating input score 100

Transparency & Controls

  • Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
  • Major donor itemization: Limited

Sustainability

  • Operating margin: 54.1%; rating input score 91; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Total-asset coverage ratio: 12.36; rating input score 93; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
  • Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
  • Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

  • Program expense growth: 44.3% per year; rating input score 100; 91st percentile among comparable filings
  • Revenue growth: 31.8% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings
  • Asset growth: 45.6% per year; rating input score 100; 94th percentile among comparable filings

Details

  • Where the money goes: 45.9% of revenue deployed · 100% of spending went to programs
  • Governance: Filed governance answers
  • Accomplishments: 1 filed program accomplishment · $1K in reported program spending
  • Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 6 people listed
  • Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
  • Schedules: 2 filed schedules
  • Filing history: 7 filing years from 2019 to 2025
  • Contacts: How to reach this organization
  • Money network: 1 filed money-flow record
  • Related organizations: Filed and resolved organization relationships.
  • Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
  • People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.

Key Signals

Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.

  • Moderate — Financial Efficiency: Mission deployment rate scored 46/100.
  • Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.