Washington State Boys & Girls Clubs Asso

What it reported doing in 2024

Department of education ospi mhppcreated and modified training content for community based organizations (cbo) staff to include a focus on trauma-informed, culturally responsive practices aligned with casel's sel framework and samhsa's trauma-informed best practices.developed a dissemination plan that reaches statewide, including rural communities and youth disproportionately impacted by the covid pandemic.scheduled and delivered eight (8) hours of training content focused on trauma-informed care in the youth development setting to new cbo hires in boys & girls club locations, including train-the-trainer and end-user formats, both virtually and in-person.provided refresher trainings to over 1,000 existing cbo staff.developed and facilitated activities for a minimum of fifty thousand (50,000) youth aligned with casel's sel framework and samhsa's trauma-informed best practices.developed and distributed educational materials and resources for a minimum of fifty thousand (50,000) youth and their parents aligned with casel's sel framework and samhsa's trauma-informed best practices.offered supplemental content and support to staff and youth through dedicated staffing.developed and implemented a program evaluation tool that assesses shorter-term impacts.evaluated training efforts to measure increases in staff competency to deliver trauma-informed, culturally responsive support to youth.documented project outcomes and shared them with state and local leaders.shared copies of sub-contracts once finalized.disclosed funding sources when sharing program work with partners and stakeholders.collected and shared outcome data at the end of each fiscal cycle.collected and shared youth voice data on program impacts among participating students.shared copies of subcontracts with external organizations.

Financial Efficiency

• Mission deployment rate: 100%; rating input score 100
• Program expense ratio: 99.2%; rating input score 99
• Fundraising efficiency: $134.34 raised per $1 spent on fundraising; rating input score 89; 89th percentile among comparable filings

Transparency & Controls

• Consistency checks: 90.9%; rating input score 91; 5th percentile among comparable filings
• Pay-setting controls: 5 of 6 controls in place; rating input score 83
  • Compensation committee: Pass
  • Independent consultant: Pass
  • Other Form 990s reviewed: Pass
  • Written employment contract: Missing
  • Compensation survey or study: Pass
  • Board or committee approval: Pass
• Foreign activity oversight: Limited
• Grant itemization coverage: 92.4%; rating input score 92; 27th percentile among comparable filings
• Major donor itemization: Yes; rating input score 100
• Related-party transparency: Limited

Accountability

• Independent voting board: 100%; rating input score 100; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
• Governance controls: 8 of 8 controls in place; rating input score 100
  • Conflict-of-interest policy: Pass
  • Whistleblower policy: Pass
  • Document-retention policy: Pass
  • CEO compensation review process: Pass
  • Other executive compensation review process: NotApplicable
  • Form 990 shared with the board: Pass
  • Board meeting minutes documented: Pass
  • Audit committee oversight: Pass
  • Independent financial-statement audit: Pass

Sustainability

• Operating margin: -3.1%; rating input score 24; 24th percentile among comparable filings
• Total-asset coverage ratio: 0.77; rating input score 28; 28th percentile among comparable filings
• Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.08; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
• Officer compensation ratio: 2.1%; rating input score 75; 75th percentile among comparable filings

Growth

• Program expense growth: 28.6% per year; rating input score 100; 92nd percentile among comparable filings
• Revenue growth: 28.2% per year; rating input score 100; 93rd percentile among comparable filings
• Asset growth: 41.1% per year; rating input score 100; 96th percentile among comparable filings