Washington State Association of Veterinary Technicians
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 910987059
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2016–2024
- Forms available
- Form 990 2023, Form 990-EZ 2024, Form 990-N 2014
- Location
- North Bend, WA, USA
- Phone
- 4254459991
- Rating
- 80
- Verdict
- STRONG
- Rating confidence
- Moderate
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $187,522
- Expenses
- $185,781
- Assets
- $345,862
- Liabilities
- $3,501
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
5 people listed
Executive titles in this filing
- Ashley Byrne (Past President)
- Bryona Frick (President Elect)
- Geoffrey Michaelis (Vice President)
People named in this filing
- Ashley Byrne (Past President)
- Bryona Frick (President Elect)
- Geoffrey Michaelis (Vice President)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2024. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
The Washington State Association of Veterinary Technicians mission is to advance the profession of veterinary technology in Washington State. The organization does this by providing educational programs, maintaining standards, promoting positive legislation, and cooperating with other professional veterinary organizations.
What it reported doing in 2024
Continuing education for veterinarians, technicians, students, practice managers, and veterinary staff to promote veterinary technologies and maintain standards inthe profession. Individual continuing education classes are held in addition to the annual Pacific Northwest Veterinary Conference.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Direct operator. The filing allocates 100% of reported program-service expenses outside its grant, affiliate-payment, and member-benefit lines. This expense classification does not rule out separately announced grant awards.
The verdict
STRONG - A large share of available resources goes toward mission work and the filed numbers largely add up. Expenses are high relative to revenue and liabilities are high compared with assets.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 80
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 53
- Growth: 100
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: 80.3%; rating input score 80
- Program expense ratio: 81.1%; rating input score 81
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 52nd percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: 0.9%; rating input score 37; 37th percentile among comparable filings
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 1.86; rating input score 78; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: 0.01; rating input score 42; 42nd percentile among comparable filings
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 63; 63rd percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: 21.5% per year; rating input score 100; 78th percentile among comparable filings
- Revenue growth: 13.3% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 15.6% per year; rating input score 100; 74th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 80.3% of revenue deployed · 81.1% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments · $151K in reported program spending
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 5 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 7 current checks pass
- Schedules: 1 filed schedules
- Filing history: 8 filing years from 2016 to 2024
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Operating margin scored 37/100.
- Moderate — Sustainability: Liabilities to assets ratio scored 42/100.