Washington Regional Transplant Community
Nonprofit profile at a glance
- EIN
- 521528461
- IRS 990-EZ coverage
- 2023–2023
- Forms available
- Form 990 2022, Form 990-EZ 2023
- Location
- Falls Church, VA, USA
- Phone
- 7036410100
- Rating confidence
- Limited
Reported finances
- Revenue
- $0
- Expenses
- $30,433,725
- Assets
- $0
- Liabilities
- $0
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Amounts in USD.
Leadership & pay
12 people listed
People named in this filing
- KEVIN J HARLEN MSPH FACHE (CHAIR)
- THOMAS F KAUFMAN ESQ (VICE CHAIR)
- KEITH GHEZZI MD (DIRECTOR)
Selected names, not a complete roster or a statement of current roles. Open leadership details for the complete filed list.
Source: IRS Form 990-EZ. Selected filing: tax year 2023. Names and roles reflect this filing, not necessarily current officeholders.
Overview
Mission
To recover organs and tissue by preserving every donation option, excelling in recovery and placement, and providing care for donors and their families.
What it reported doing in 2023
Organ and tissue recovery: acquisition - the organ and tissue recovery process is managed by wrtc with support from various hospitals, laboratories and physician partners. Wrtc works in concert with its hospital partners to acquire the resources needed for each case, i.e., various laboratory tests, an operating room, medical/surgical supplies, a declaring physician, etc. Transportation costs are incurred when organs have to be transferred via ambulance.coordination - wrtc's staff are responsible for managing the entire organ, eye and tissue donation process. The process includes assessing the organs and tissues to determine medical suitability, obtaining authorization from the next-of-kin, allocating the organs using the national wait list for recipients, and surgically recovering the organs and tissues. After recovery, organs are given to a surgeon for transplant or sent to a tissue bank for processing.
Operating model
- Revenue model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent revenue detail to tell how this nonprofit funds its work.
- Distribution model
- Cannot be determined from the filing. The filing does not provide enough consistent spending detail to tell whether the nonprofit works directly or through others.
The verdict
- The available evidence is not sufficient to produce an overall rating for this filing. This is not a warning sign.
Rating breakdown
- Financial Efficiency: 0
- Transparency & Controls: 82
- Sustainability: 7
- Growth: 20
Detailed rating inputs
Financial Efficiency
- Mission deployment rate: Limited
- Program expense ratio: 0%; rating input score 0
Transparency & Controls
- Consistency checks: 100%; rating input score 100; 51st percentile among comparable filings
- Major donor itemization: Limited
Sustainability
- Operating margin: Limited
- Total-asset coverage ratio: 0; rating input score 2; 2nd percentile among comparable filings
- Liabilities to assets ratio: Limited
- Officer compensation ratio: 0%; rating input score 56; 56th percentile among comparable filings
Growth
- Program expense growth: Limited
- Revenue growth: -4.2% per year; rating input score 0; 38th percentile among comparable filings
- Asset growth: 1.4% per year; rating input score 100; 44th percentile among comparable filings
Details
- Where the money goes: 0% of spending went to programs
- Governance: Filed governance answers
- Accomplishments: 3 filed program accomplishments
- Leadership: top reported pay $0 · 12 people listed
- Consistency: 7 of 8 current checks pass · 1 finding to review
- Schedules: 3 filed schedules
- Contacts: How to reach this organization
- Money network: 13 filed money-flow records
- Grant readiness: Federal tax and exclusion status, award history, and grant-maker relationships.
- People: Everyone the filings name, and which of them the filings identify by more than a name.
Key Signals
Signals prioritize questions for review. They are not findings of misconduct.
- High — Financial Efficiency: Program expense ratio scored 0/100.
- Moderate — Transparency & Controls: Part III transfer expenses within program total did not reconcile in the filed values.
- High — Sustainability: Total-asset coverage ratio scored 2/100.
- High — Growth: Revenue growth scored 0/100.
- Review — Sustainability: Officer compensation ratio scored 56/100.